<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>99147</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[New York Times Takes Back Miley Cyrus Headline: "She Was Not Topless"]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/29/new-york-times-takes-back_n_99147.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>The <em>New York Times</em> treated yesterday's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/miley-cyrus-vanity-fair">Miley Cyrus/<em>Vanity Fair</em></a> story as a business one, running the headline "A Topless Photo Threatens a Major Disney Franchise." But today it appears the <em>Times</em> realized how damaging a loaded word like topless could be &amp;mdash; especially when Cyrus wasn't topless at all. Today's paper ran a correction and the online edition revised its headline to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/28/business/media/28hannah.html">"Revealing Photo Threatens a Major Disney Franchise."</a> The correction is below:</p>

<blockquote><em>
This article has been revised to...</em></blockquote>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Media]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-05-07T05:12:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
