<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>103241</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Emily Gould: New Gloss On An Old Story]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/23/emily-gould-new-gloss-on_n_103241.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>For anyone who has followed the saga of <strong>Emily Gould</strong>, this week's <em>New York Times </em>magazine <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/25/magazine/25internet-t.html?em&amp;ex=1211688000&amp;en=beb20c82f3058f7a&amp;ei=5070">cover story</a> comes as a shock only to the extent that they would publish it. True, they've already gotten tons of buzz out of it &amp;mdash; and if that is the goal (as NYT mag editor<strong> Gerry Marzorati </strong>seemed to indicate <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/news/emily_gould_how_the_new_york_times_magazine_thinks_we_live_now_85498.asp">here</a>), then who cares what that buzz is? Because, well, it's not good &amp;mdash; and for anyone who's followed the saga...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Media]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-05-31T05:12:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
