<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>114163</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Least Walkable Cities]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/21/least-walkable-cities_n_114163.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://treehugger.com/"><img src='http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/22039/original.jpg' align="right"></a></p>

<p>When <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/07/walk_score_cool.php">Walk Score</a> recently released their ranking of the <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/07/walk-score-ranks-top-ten-most-walkable-cities.php">ten most walkable U.S. cities</a> there was no doubt that folks in places like San Francisco, Boston and New York City could look with satisfaction upon their city as a paradise for bipedalism. But when we took a look at the rankings it became clear that there was quite a spread between some of the most and least friendly areas for walking in which to live....</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Green]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-07-29T05:12:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
