<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>231409</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[GOP Representative Worried That Public Option Has Lower Costs, "Advantages"]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/14/gop-representative-worrie_n_231409.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>The public option. Polls indicate that the American people are <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/17/obama-boost-new-poll-show_n_217175.html">head over heels in love with the public option</a>. And the preliminary scoring from the Congressional Budget Office gives some indication why: <a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_treatment/archive/2009/07/10/exclusive-early-cbo-score-on-public-plan-it-s-good.aspx">the early word</a> is that a "strong public option--the kind that the House of Representatives is putting in its reform bill--should net somewhere in the neighborhood of $150 billion in savings over ten years. "</p>

<p>But, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/key-republican-troubled-that-public-option-is-cheaper-has-clear-advantages.php">via Brian Beutler at TPM</a> comes the news that at...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-07-14T11:01:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
