<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>8826</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Catch-22 at the New York Times]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/catch22-at-the-new-york-t_b_8826.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>It's put up or shut up time at the paper of record.</p>

<p>Now that Judge Hogan has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/13/national/13leak.html?ex=1286856000&amp;amp;en=369dd16e763412c0&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss">lifted</a> Judy Miller's contempt citation, there is no reason for the <em>Times</em> to hold back on its <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/04/national/04reporter.html?ex=1286078400&amp;amp;en=3ed1ac0df23c6552&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss">promised</a> full accounting of the Miller story. <br />
 <br />
Rarely has so much been riding on a single article. Especially internally. The frustration I've been reporting on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/judy-miller-do-we-want-_b_4791.html">since July</a> has now spilled into the MSM with "<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2005/10/13/BL2005101300684_pf.html">nearly a dozen <em>Times</em> staffers</a>" venting...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:46:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
