<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>1125</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[On God, Darwin, Viagra, and the Female Orgasm]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/on-god-darwin-viagra-and-_b_1125.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>So WMD aren&acirc;€™t the only thing we thought we&acirc;€™d nailed down but which subsequently went missing. Add to that list the female orgasm -- specifically, the evolutionary reason for the female orgasm. Today&acirc;€™s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/17/science/17orga.html?pagewanted=all">New York Times</a> reports on a new book called "<a href="http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/LLOCAS.html">The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution</a>," by Dr. Elisabeth A. Lloyd. Her thesis is that the female orgasm is not necessary for reproduction, and thus is not an evolutionary adaptation....</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:46:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
