<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>185309</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[The Debate Over Online News: It's the Consumer, Stupid]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/the-debate-over-online-ne_b_185309.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>The discussion about the aggregation and distribution of content on the web heated up this week when the Associated Press <a href="http://www.ap.org/pages/about/pressreleases/pr_040609a.html">announced</a> plans to "launch an industry initiative" designed "to protect news content" online.</p>

<p>The announcement -- characterized by the <em>New York Times</em>' Saul Hansell as a "<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/the-aps-real-enemies-are-its-customers/?pagemode=print">war on search engines and aggregators</a>" -- drew considerable fire, including blasts <a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/04/some-questions-related-to-google-news.html">from Google</a>, <em><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30136462/">BusinessWeek</a></em>, the <a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/robert/200904/1689/">Online Journalism Review</a>, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/that-whining-sound-you-hear-is-the-death-wheeze-of-newspapers/">TechCrunch</a>, and this classic broadside from <a href="http://daggle.com/090406-225638.html">Danny Sullivan at...</a></p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Media]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-04-10T18:43:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
