<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>125687</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Conservatives Reject House "All Of The Above" Energy Bill]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-scher/conservatives-reject-hous_b_125687.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>The House leadership is offering a compromise "All of the Above" energy bill that goes farther than the <a href="http://conrad.senate.gov/pressroom/record.cfm?id=301684&amp;">Senate "Gang of 10" compromise</a> -- both in coastal drilling and in clean energy. (See coverage from <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/11/washington/11cong.html?ref=us">NYT</a>, <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gB6bi0EyTozdEPy0KGisTQNaS2PQD9346A381">AP</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/10/AR2008091004117.html">Reuters</a> and <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122109324329121691.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">WSJ</a>.) </p>

<p>Yet congressional conservatives still are rejecting it, furthering proving they do not really support an "All of the Above" energy strategy, because they are (<a href="http://ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2008093711/talk-about-being-bed-oil-companies">literally!</a>) in bed with Big Oil.</p>

<p>While the Senate bill would...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Green]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-10-12T05:12:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
