<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>664</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[To Jim Lampley and the Ohio skeptics]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/byron-york/to-jim-lampley-and-the-oh_b_664.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>Enough about the bookies. [See previous posts in this argument <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/2005/05/biggest-story-of-our-live.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/2005/05/with-apologies-to-jim-lam.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/2005/05/with-apologies-to-byron-y.html">here</a>.] Your faith in the exit pollsters is greater than the exit pollsters' faith in themselves -- just take a look at head pollster Warren Mitofsky's <a href="http://www.exit-poll.net/election-night/EvaluationJan192005.pdf">apology/explanation</a> [pdf] for his skewed results. This is how the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22188-2005Jan19.html?nav=rss_politics/elections/2004">reported</a> it in January:<blockquote>Interviewing for the 2004 exit polls was the most inaccurate of any in the past five presidential elections as procedural...</blockquote></p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Business]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:46:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
