<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>168486</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Mini Madoff Scandal Scales New Linguistic Heights]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-h-green/mini-madoff-scandal-scale_b_168486.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>R. Allen Stanford, head of Stanford International Bank, has been charged with fraud by the SEC.</p>

<p>Another day, another Ponzi scheme. Stanford's take: $8 Billion. Not chump change, of course, but neither does it put him in Madoff's league (up to $40 billion).</p>

<p>I think I shall call him mini-Madoff.</p>

<p>But the Stanford scandal has set a linguistic record -- a record for creative disingenuousness. According to <a href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2009/02/18/attorney-for-stanfords-disaffirmation-of-prior-statements-was-red-flag-for-sec/">Securities Docket</a>:</p>

<blockquote>...one of Stanford's own lawyers has emerged as a key figure in the matter....</blockquote>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Business]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-02-20T08:04:00-05:00</date_published>
</oembed>
