<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>215047</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[The Simple Arithmetic of Federal Deficits, A Counterpoint to the New York Times Analysis]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-fiderer/the-simple-arithmetic-of_b_215047.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>"The Great Debt Scare is back," writes <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/06/11/deficits/index.html">Robert Reich</a> in response to a <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/10/business/economy/10leonhardt.html?scp=1&amp;sq=deficits&amp;st=cse">New York Times</a></em> analysis of how the government's finances devolved into a "Sea of Red Ink." The <em>Times'</em> starting point is a <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/27xx/doc2727/entire-report.pdf">Congressional Budget Office forecast</a>, presented in January 2001, which showed a $3.5 trillion surplus accumulated over the 2001 - 2008 period. </p>

<p>Actually, both Reich and the <em>Times</em> seem to be pulling their punches. They might have offered more cogent analyses had they...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Business]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-07-04T09:19:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
