<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>43310</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Debunking the NYT's Sloppy Hit Piece on Gore]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-roberts/debunking-the-nyts-sloppy_b_43310.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Drudge breathlessly <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/3/12/161214/079">reported</a> a coming &amp;quot;hit on Gore&amp;quot; from <em>The New York Times</em>. Today that hit has come, in the form of a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html?ex=1331438400&amp;amp;en=2df9d6e7a5aa6ed6&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss">state-of-the-art piece of slime from Bill Broad</a>.</p><p> This may be the worst, sloppiest, most dishonest piece of reporting I've ever seen in the NYT. It's got all the hallmarks of a vintage Gore hit piece: half-truths, outright falsehoods, unsubstantiated quotes, and a heaping dose of innuendo. As usual with these things, unless you've been...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:47:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
