<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>37639</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[High Broderism Reaches the Global Warming Debate]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-roberts/high-broderism-reaches-th_b_37639.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/1/2/131839/3289"><em>grist.org</em></a></p><p><img src=""><em>New York Times</em> science/environment writer Andy Revkin produced a truly bizarre piece over the weekend: &amp;quot;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/01/science/01climate.html?ex=1325307600&amp;amp;en=ca1de62784dec443&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss">Middle Stance Emerging in Debate Over Climate</a>.&amp;quot; Frankly, I'm surprised it got past the NYT's news editors. </p><p>It strikes me as a good illustration of the limits of traditional journalism, since what Revkin's up to is not a description of a state of affairs -- i.e., reporting news -- but an <em> attempt to frame a debate</em>. Does that belong in the...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:47:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
