<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>56226</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Since When Did D.C. Progressives Decide to Start Attacking State Progressives?]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/since-when-did-dc-progres_b_56226.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>Following the debate this week where Washington-based progressive activists attacked progressive efforts to expand health care at the state level (see <a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/jul/13/why_we_cant_reform_healthcare_one_state_at_a_time">here</a>, <a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/jul/13/taking_progressive_devolution_too_far#new">here</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2007/0707.Klein.html">here</a>), <a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/jul/14/our_apparently_schizo_federal_govt_or_why_feds_and_state_activists_can_work_together">Nathan Newman offers us this post that asks a few simple questions</a>: Why do D.C. folks feel so threatened by states taking action on the agenda they say they care so much about, to the point they are now calling all efforts by states to lead on expanding health care "</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:47:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
