<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>16024</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Who Is Really "Weak" On National Security?]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/who-is-really-weak-on-nat_b_16024.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=ur2&amp;tag=sirotablog-20&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;path=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fproduct%2F0307237346%2Fqid%3D1135296981%2Fsr%3D8-1%2Fref%3Dsr_8_xs_ap_bn1_xgl14%3Fn%3D507846%2526s%3Dbooks%2526v%3Dglance"><img vspace="5" hspace="5" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.davidsirota.com/hostiletakeovermed.gif"></A><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=sirotablog-20&amp;amp;l=ur2&amp;amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />Karl Rove has made no secret of his desire to try to ramrod the 2006 elections into a debate over who is &amp;quot;tough&amp;quot; on national security. And it seems more and more Democrats are frightened to actually have the debate. Oh sure, these Democrats wouldn't tell you that - in fact, many are posturing as tough guys even as they cower in fear of...</a></p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:46:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
