<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>81389</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Atheism as a Stealth Religion III: Four Questions and Six Possible Answers]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sloan-wilson/atheism-as-a-stealth-reli_2_b_81389.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sloan-wilson">previous two blogs</a> (<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sloan-wilson/atheism-as-a-stealth-reli_b_76901.html">I </a>and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sloan-wilson/atheism-as-a-stealth-reli_b_79825.html">II</a>) stressed that we must be skeptical about atheist beliefs, lest they go the way of stealth religions. Now let's roll up our sleeves and see what this means for the study of overt religions. Here are four questions: </p>

<p>Q1) Is there any scientific (i.e., empirically verifiable) evidence for the existence of supernatural agents that intervene in natural processes, especially to alter human affairs?</p>

<p>Q2) If not, how can we explain the...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Living]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:48:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
