<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>26838</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[THIS IS NOT CHICK LIT: What's in a Title?]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-merrick/this-is-not-chick-lit-wha_b_26838.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/nclcov.JPG"><img alt="nclcov.JPG" src="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/nclcov-thumb.JPG" width="118" height="180" align="left" hspace="5"/></a>So many of us wondered what made Amy Sutherland's recent <i>New York Times</i> piece "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/25/fashion/25love.html?ex=1155268800&amp;en=929d5ce967c44678&amp;ei=5087%0A">What Shamu Taught Me About a Happy Marriage</a>" one of the most emailed articles of all time. The piece was insightful, sure, but the most emailed of all time? Could it have had to do with the title?</p>

<p>I've been thinking a lot about this--the question of titles--in regard to my recent controversial anthology <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0812975677/sr=8-1/qid=1152214314/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-1146985-9560951?redirect=true&amp;ie=UTF8"><i>This Is Not Chick...</i></a></p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Living]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:46:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
