<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>28783</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Poor, Indeed: The Census Poverty Data Debate, Continued]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-alterman/poor-indeed-the-census-po_b_28783.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><small><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3449870/">Altercation</a></small></p>

<p><strong>The Mickster jumped</strong></b> on a small mischaracterization in a New York Times article <u><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/30/us/30census.html?pagewanted=2&amp;amp;_r=1&amp;amp;ref=todayspaper" target="_blank"><u>here</u></a></u> to attack me, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, and anybody else that highlighted the new Census data on the percentage of the poor living in extreme poverty, <u><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2148486/&amp;amp;#alterspin" target="_blank"><u>here</u></a></u>.&amp;nbsp; The Times reported that some advocates for the poor pointed to a "sharp increase" in 2005 in the percentage of poor people below half the poverty line.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;While that percentage did increase...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:46:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
