<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>23546</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[The Press Derides Dems on Iraq; The Public Praises Dems on Iraq]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-boehlert/the-press-derides-dems-on_b_23546.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0743289315/qid=1141231641/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/002-3787172-8371221?s=books&amp;v=glance&amp;n=283155""><img alt="Lapdogs---RS-Fix.jpg" src="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/Lapdogs---RS-Fix-thumb.jpg" width="123" height="180" align="right"/></a></p>

<p>It's been a head-scratching spectacle this week to watch Democrats in the Senate debate war resolutions that would press the administration to begin bringing troops home, and then be depicted in the press as the likely losers in the unfolding political battle. Losers because Democrats are "divided" (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/21/washington/21kerry.html?_">New York Times</a>), "struggling for consensus" (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/20/AR2006062000138_pf.html">Washington Post</a>), and "squabbling among themselves" (Knight Ridder), as opposed to Republicans who appear unified behind Bush's 'stay the...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Media]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:46:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
