<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>26921</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Time Plays (Really) Dumb About Lamont]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-boehlert/time-plays-really-dumb-ab_b_26921.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0743289315/qid=1141231641/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/002-3787172-8371221?s=books&amp;v=glance&amp;n=283155""><img alt="Lapdogs---RS-Fix.jpg" src="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/Lapdogs---RS-Fix-thumb.jpg" width="123" height="180" align="right"/></a></p>

<p>Did you know Ned Lamont's win in Tuesday's Connecticut Democratic primary has energized "gleeful Republicans" because it will allow them to portray Democrats as anti-war? It's true, I <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1224692,00.html">read it </a>in <em>Time</em>. What I didn't read in <em>Time </em>though, was the fact that a clear majority of Americans now label themselves anti-war as well, which might complicate the GOP strategy <em>Time </em>seems so enthralled by. Then again, we've seen this <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0743289315/qid=1141231641/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/104-">lapdog </a>act...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Media]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:46:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
