<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>95846</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Study: Hillary's Popular Vote Hope a Mirage]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/glenn-hurowitz/study-hillarys-popular-vo_b_95846.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>Wharton professor Gregory P. Nini (who worked with me on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0944624480?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=httpwwwdemocr-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0944624480"><em>Fear and Courage in the Democratic Party</em></a> ) and I just released a <a href="http://www.dcourage.com/Caucus%20Study.pdf">new study</a> that undermines Hillary Clinton's efforts to claim popular legitimacy from a possible win in the popular vote. The problem: in 2008 the popular vote isn't really popular. </p>

<p>That's because 13 states held caucuses instead of primaries. Because of the challenges of participating in caucuses (fixed times, long time commitment), far fewer people vote...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-04-17T05:12:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
