<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>54779</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Who Cares About Classical Music, Part 3]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/glenn-kurtz/who-cares-about-classical_2_b_54779.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>In yesterday's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/02/arts/music/02conn.html?ref=arts"><em>New York Times</em></a>, Edward Rothstein took up the question, "Who Cares About Classical Music?" in a review of Lawrence Kramer's recently published book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0520250826/ref=s9_asin_title_3-1966_p/103-4217433-0487002?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_s=center-1&amp;pf_rd_r=01YGRXX6G1NEBEWF9BP6&amp;pf_rd_t=101&amp;pf_rd_p=288448401&amp;pf_rd_i=507846"><em>Why Classical Music Still Matters</em></a>.</p>

<p>Rothstein rightly notes the desperation in Kramer's title, commenting, "it is the kind of title that would not have been used a generation ago...What has changed is not how much the tradition means to its devotees, but how little it means to everyone else." </p>

<p>Kramer's argument, which Rothstein criticizes...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:47:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
