<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>58221</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Did Someone Say Something About Humans Affecting Rainfall?]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/grant-perry/did-someone-say-something_b_58221.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago, Rupert Murdoch's <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/weather/article2127599.ece"><em>Times of London</em> screamed</a> "A catastrophe with mankind's footprints stamped on it." The <em>Times</em>' more conservative rival, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/07/24/earain124.xml"><em>The Telegraph</em></a>, was more dispassionate, with its headline reading "Man-made global warming increases rainfall." Of course, the left-leaning <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/jul/24/sciencenews.weather"><em>Guardian</em></a> also covered the story. Japan's leading daily, <a href="http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/features/science/20070728TDY04002.htm"><em>Yomiuri Shimbun</em></a>, had a similar headline. So did the <a href="http://www.thestar.com/News/article/238978"><em>Toronto Star</em></a>, the <a href="http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=69aa23f5-30a8-464e-ada4-931d04bcff1c"><em>Vancouver Sun</em></a> and <a href="http://www.hindu.com/seta/2007/07/26/stories/2007072650061500.htm"><em>The Hindu</em></a>. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>What did <em>The New York Times,...</em></p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:47:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
