<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>155553</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[NY Times Responds Weakly Today to Israel's 'Incursion' -- As Shells Kill Dozens at U.N. School]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/nyt-responds-weakly-to-is_b_155553.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>Even as its news pages offer generally balanced coverage of Israel's attacks in Gaza -- with many chilling accounts of civilian casualties -- <em>The New York Times</em>' editorial page continued its role today as a key outside enabler. Its editorial today merely declared that the paper is "concerned" about the ongoing invasion -- or "incursion," in the paper's softened terminology -- not alarmed or even angry. </p>

<p>The headline over the belated editorial could not be more bland: "Incursion Into Gaza."</p>

<p>Now...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Media]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-01-06T10:37:00-05:00</date_published>
</oembed>
