<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>89500</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[The Campaign of Magical Thinking]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer-nix/the-campaign-of-magical-t_b_89500.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>When a top Hillary Clinton advisor predicted on February 16 that his candidate would "lock down" the Democratic nomination, called the number of elections and delegates won by Barack Obama "irrelevant," and later characterized the race as "<a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/democratic-rivals-turn-up-heat-ahead-of-ohio-texas-2008-02-25.html">wide open</a>," it occurred to me that in the homestretch to March 4th, and what could be the decisive primaries, Clinton's campaign is relying heavily on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking">magical thinking</a>.</p>

<p>These bold statements, from longtime Clinton cohort Harold Ickes, demand subscription to the notions...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:48:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
