<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>131348</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[VPs Should Be Pressed On Unresolved Issues From First Debate]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-soltz/vps-should-be-pressed-on_b_131348.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>In a post before the presidential debate last week, I wrote about <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-soltz/tonights-debate-what-vets_b_129600.html">five key things< /a>that veterans would be watching for in the debate. And, most of those questions were actually addressed, which was great. But two issues remain very much unresolved. It's my hope that there's a deeper examination of these issues tonight.</p>

<p>To repeat my questions, the first was:</p>

<blockquote>1)	Will the candidates (and the moderator) note the difference between "tactical" success of the surge, versus the overall strategic goal...</blockquote></a></p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-11-02T05:12:00-05:00</date_published>
</oembed>
