<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>116751</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Obama Delivers a Real Energy Plan for America: Efficiency Now, 10% Renewables by 2012, One Million Plug-ins by 2015]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-romm/obama-delivers-a-real-ene_b_116751.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>Senator Barack Obama has fulfilled the promise of <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/09/obamas-excellent-energy-and-climate-plan/">his earlier climate plan</a> with a detailed and comprehensive "<a href="http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/factsheet_energy_speech_080308.pdf">New Energy for America</a>" plan.</p>

<p>This is easily the best energy plan ever put forward by a nominee of either party. By comparison, the plan of John "<a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/04/mccain-calls-for-700-new-nuclear-plants-and-7-yucca-mountains-costing-4-trillion/">Nothing but Nukes</a>" McCain is a joke, with <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/07/mccain-on-energy-efficiency-he-is-cheneys-third-term/">nothing on energy efficiency</a> and a <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/06/23/mccain-proposes-another-energy-gimmick-part-1-pointless-battery-prize-is-this-another-300m-to-exxonmobil/">pointless $300 million battery prize</a> and <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/anti-wind-mccain-delivers-climate-remarks-at-foreign-wind-company-part-i/">long-standing opposition to renewable energy</a>. In contrast, Obama's plan has real...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-08-12T05:12:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
