<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>25919</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Starchild Cherrix Case:  "Alternative" Medicine V. "Quackery"?]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maia-szalavitz/starchild-cherrix-case-al_b_25919.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>Should the state have the right to force <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/25/AR2006072500945.html?sub=AR">a sixteen-year-old</a>-- whose family has supported his decision to use an "alternative" treatment rather than undergo conventional cancer care-- to accept chemotherapy?</p>

<p>The media has covered the Abraham Starchild Cherrix case as a question of rights-- whether the parents and the teen are legally permitted to "choose" between alternative and conventional medicine.</p>

<p>But my colleague Trevor Butterworth at stats.org <a href="http://www.stats.org/stories/a_tale_two_cancer_jul26_06.htm">points out</a> that the coverage has failed to examine whether the "alternative" treatment...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Business]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:46:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
