<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>41675</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Net Neutrality: A New Sticking Point For Liberal Bloggers]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/melissa-lafsky/net-neutrality-a-new-stic_b_41675.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>There's been <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2875387&amp;page=1">plenty</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2007/02/16/obama/print.html">written</a> about the ever-vigilant blogosphere's effects on the coming election. Now the <em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/19/AR2007021900934.html?sub=AR">examines</a> a new twist to blogger/candidate relations: the aggressive push by bloggers for a direct say in Internet-related policymaking. The key issue at stake, as <em>Post</em> staff writer <strong>Charles Babington</strong> reports, is net neutrality, the term for the growing movement to keep Internet providers (primarily large telecom companies) from charging tolls on content from certain websites and applications (I.E. those...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Politics]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:47:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
