<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>223470</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[AIG Plummets: Didn't the Reverse Stock Split Cause it?]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-russnow/aig-plummets-didnt-the-re_b_223470.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>For those who commented that I didn't know what I was talking about in <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-russnow/aig-proposed-reverse-stoc_b_221801.html">my recent article about the AIG Reverse Stock Split of 20 to one</a>, here's what <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10531283/1/no-seriously-ceo-says-aig-is-stabilizing.html?puc=_cnnmoney&amp;cm_ven=CNNMONEY&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed">Jeanine Poggi of Street.com said today</a> of the split action, which has apparently gone through:</p>

<blockquote>Meanwhile, investors are awaiting a reverse stock split that is expected to come into affect (sic) later today. This would mean if you own 1,000 shares you now own 50.

<p><br />
AIG will initially multiply the...</p></blockquote>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Business]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-07-01T17:03:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
