<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>77695</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Reading The Pictures: Cocaine, Kindergarten -- And Now, The Hand]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-shaw/reading-the-pictures-coca_b_77695.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><img alt="2007-12-20-ObamHand.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2007-12-20-ObamHand.jpg" width="307" height="350" style="margin: 0 auto;" />
</p>

<p>Is there some rule somewhere that says that big media is required to publish every cheap piece of opposition dirt? Or, is this latest gem -- smack on today's <em>NYT</em> front page -- justified simply to hype the drama as we approach D-day in Iowa?</p>

<p>It is not sad enough the <em>Times</em> had to publicize how Obama voted "present" 3.25% of the time in the Illinois legislature -- rather than " taking...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Media]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-28T02:48:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
