<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>218200</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Will the Biofuels Industry Hang Itself in the Climate Bill?]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathanael-greene/will-the-biofuels-industr_b_218200.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org"><img alt="Visit NRDCs Switchboard Blog" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2009-02-04-switchboard.gif" width="130" height="36" align="right" /></a><p>Last week I wrote about the danger of industry-backed changes to the Waxman-Markey climate bill that could, perversely, <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/ngreene/bioenergy_in_the_balance_in_th.html" target="_blank">incentivize deforestation and increase global warming emissions</a>.&amp;nbsp; Comparing the current bill language to the drastically weaker alternative advocated by Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson, House leaders face a relatively clear choice between bioenergy done <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/energy/biofuels.asp" target="_blank">right and bioenergy done wrong</a>.</p><p>A <em></em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/16/AR2009061602796.html" target="_blank">Washington Post editorial</a> yesterday reinforces the importance...</p></p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Green]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-06-19T15:57:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
