<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>177597</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Philanthropy at its Somewhat Myopic: Mistaking Means and Ends]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-brest/philanthropy-at-its-somew_b_177597.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>In the last post, I described the National Committee For Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP)'s prescriptions for foundation governance in <em>Criteria for Philanthropy at its Best</em>&Acirc;&reg;. Here I'll discuss its prescriptions for grantmaking practices themselves. I will also discuss NCRP's literally unbelievable response to critics of its <em>Criteria</em>. </p>

<p>But first the nitty-gritty. The most significant of NCRP's grantmaking requirements is that 50 percent of a foundation's grants be for general operating support (GOS) -- unrestricted support for an organization. </p>

<p>Just so you...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Business]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-03-20T20:53:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
