<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>208581</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[The Wonderful Politics of Cap-and-Trade: A Closer Look at Waxman-Markey]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-stavins/the-wonderful-politics-of_b_208581.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>The headline of this post is not meant to be ironic. Despite all the hand-wringing in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124304449649349403.html">press</a> and the <a href="http://www.carbontax.org/blogarchives/2009/05/20/good-news-theres-a-climate-bill-bad-news-it-stinks/">blogosphere</a> about a political "give-away" of allowances for the cap-and-trade system in <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=1622:chairmen-waxman-and-markey-introduce-the-american-clean-energy-and-security-act&amp;catid=155:statements&amp;Itemid=81">the Waxman-Markey bill</a> voted out of committee last week, the politics of cap-and-trade systems are truly quite wonderful, which is why these systems have been used, and used successfully.</p>

<p>The Waxman-Markey allocation of allowances has its problems, which I will get to, but before noting those...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Green]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-06-28T05:12:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
