<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>155861</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[In Defense of Nicole Kidman...]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-mendelson/in-defense-of-nicole-kidm_b_155861.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_U-_MB3ct83I/SWKTvFp0cgI/AAAAAAAABxY/SjSgmWP31Xw/s1600-h/Nicole_Kidman_068.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 248px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_U-_MB3ct83I/SWKTvFp0cgI/AAAAAAAABxY/SjSgmWP31Xw/s320/Nicole_Kidman_068.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5287951349667099138" border="0" /></a>No star has faced more wrongheaded attacks over the last few years than Nicole Kidman. For years, she's been chased by the label of 'box office poison', and further <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSTRE4BT5G020081230">cries for her to be tarred and feathered</a> have arisen after the expensive and artsy period picture <span style="font-style: italic;">Australia</span> somehow didn't equal its $130 million...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-01-07T09:33:00-05:00</date_published>
</oembed>
