<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>154223</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Time To Have a Little Talk  About Those "Women's Magazines?"]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sheila-weller/time-to-have-a-little-tal_b_154223.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[I admire Caroline Kennedy. Her dignity and her character are striking. So
when she made the remark to the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/28/nyregion/28kennedy.html">New York Times'</a></em> David Halbfinger the other day,
"Have you guys ever thought of writing for a woman's magazine or something?
...You're supposed to be crack political journalists," I was surprised -- and
disappointed. Then I had a wider concern: Why, 40 years after the advent of
second-wave feminism, are the words "women's magazine" still so automatically a
term of mild ridicule? Maybe it's a good...]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Media]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-01-30T05:12:00-05:00</date_published>
</oembed>
