<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>91467</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Who Said Beauty Has to be Dangerous?]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stacy-malkan/who-said-beauty-has-to-be_b_91467.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>The beauty industry is sitting not-too-pretty after a wave of toxic scandals: <a href="http://www.safecosmetics.org/your_health/poisonkiss.cfm">lead-containing lipstick</a>, <a href="http://www.safecosmetics.org/newsroom/press.cfm?pressReleaseID=21">1,4 dioxane</a> in kids' bubble bath, <a href="http://www.safecosmetics.org/newsroom/milwaukee_js_2_3_08.cfm">phthalates in baby shampoo</a>, to name just a few. Several states are now pushing for greater control over the virtually unregulated $50-billion industry. Two <a href="http://dist03.casen.govoffice.com/index.asp?Type=B_PR&amp;SEC=%7bADFFA2AD-C29A-4592-8781-7EC330958F3C%7d&amp;DE=%7b27142650-">bills just introduced in California</a> would eliminate toxic ingredients from certain personal care products; <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/02/new_jersey_is_joining_a.html">New Jersey, Connecticut and other states are following suit</a>. So what is Big Beauty to do? </p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[Living]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2008-03-13T19:20:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
