<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<type>link</type>
	<objectid>209989</objectid>
	<title><![CDATA[Back to Sachs: Astrology, Despotism, and Africa]]></title>
	<url>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-easterly/back-to-sachs-astrology-d_b_209989.html</url>
	<abstract><![CDATA[<p>Sachs Debate, Day Eight. Surprised that Sachs did not <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/no-need-to-oversimplify-p_b_209720.html">understand </a> the point about <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-easterly/geography-lessons-correct_b_208879.html">Occam's Razor </a> -- that a theory should be as simple as possible but no simpler. African poverty is complex, but our theories about it should not have so many complex Buts, Ors, and Excepts that they are impossible to disprove. Ignoring Occam's Razor is how astrologists stay in business. An astrologer might say: "Watch out for strangers, especially those that are short, or...</p>]]></abstract>
	<taxonomy><![CDATA[World]]></taxonomy>
	<date_published>2009-07-03T05:12:00-04:00</date_published>
</oembed>
