The Real Cost Of Staying The Course

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Posted July 21, 2008 | 03:20 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

There is no denying that the "surge" of U.S. forces in Iraq was an extraordinary success on a tactical level.

Gen. Petraeus replaced the previous strategy of "search and destroy" to "clear and hold." This transformation of tactics directly improved the situation on the ground by influencing key constituencies among the Iraqi population to halt sectarian violence, sharpen the skills of the Iraqi Security Forces and persuade the Iraqi government to take greater initiatives by acting on its own.

But nothing has been achieved that can't be reversed. Current conditions won't be stable without a long-term military commitment that will require the full support and sacrifice of the American people.

We recently gave control of Anbar to the Sunnis. Sure, this is progress, but we must keep in mind that many of these Sunnis are the people who were killing our troops for years.

The government of Iraq has now said that the U.S. must set a timetable to start withdrawing our troops -- well and good. But the Mahdi Army remains strong and very much intact. And Iran enjoys tremendous influence over the Shias -- the same ethnic group that holds a majority of the population.

In addition, most Iraqi cities have underdeveloped civil administrations and an astonishing lack of the economic diversity needed to satisfy the many sectarian groups that are still active participants in Iraq's civil war.

We've built barriers around communities in Baghdad where there's still an existing Sunni vs. Shia rift. Thousands of former insurgent fighters with American blood on their hands are now on the U.S. payroll as security guards. And despite the Iraqi Security Force's increased capability, their desire to be nonsectarian is still very questionable.

There are no street signs, no postal service, no trash department, no electrical agency, water department or phone company. Iraqis will not become Pennsylvanians anytime soon. It would take years of nation-building.

Gen. Petraeus said himself at the start of the "surge" that it could take decades just to implement the proper counter-insurgency strategy needed to pacify Iraq.

So as we acknowledge the security improvements produced by the surge, we must also acknowledge that it was only supposed to be a short-term military tactic -- not a long-term military strategy. Whether or not we can continue on the current course is very much up to the American people. Are we as a nation in it for the long haul?

We've already spent $600 billion on the Iraq war. We're running now at a rate of $3 billion a week. The members of our volunteer military are on their third or fourth year-long tours. Our military is broken and our budget deficits are astronomical. The loss of American lives is over 4,000 with an uncountable number wounded physically and psychologically.

Any American who feels that we should "stay the course" must realize that there is no way to sustain military operations in Iraq without them putting their own blood and money in the game. This would require our young people to join the Army and Marines. We'd have to buy war bonds and substantially increase taxes to stop spending money that we don't have.

I'm convinced that this would result in a full loss of will by the American people before we achieve any so-called victory.

If Americans who support this war aren't willing to put their own bodies where their rhetoric is, there can be no sustainability. If you're not using your own product, why should I buy what you're selling?

Don't get me wrong. I'm not suggesting that we continue the war. If it were up to me the troops would've been home yesterday.

Even with my strong anti-war views, I acknowledge that no one can be 100 percent certain of Iraq's fate.

But if we ever want to fully extricate ourselves from this war, we'll have to significantly change the Iraqi culture. If not, when we leave they'll just revert to the same habits they've practiced for centuries.

But creating an entirely new socialization process for the Iraqis in an effort to achieve a modern and sustainable democracy to our liking is not only un-American -- it's impossible. So let's not expend any more American lives and resources on this mission.

(See my column in today's Philadelphia Daily News)

 
 

Comments
18
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- deminmo See Profile I'm a Fan of deminmo permalink

We are in Iraq as an occupying force. No Democrat in
Washington sees a problem with that. The real reason we
stay is because we have oil interests. I know that our military
has done some work to make Iraqi's lives better. They have
waited for the Iraqi government to get their act together. Taxpayers
continue to see the economy go south as more money is spent
in the Middle East. Yea, I agree let's get the draft back. But higher
taxes...oooh Republicans won't like that!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 07/22/2008
- John Bruhns - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of John Bruhns permalink

deminmo,

This was written to outline exactly what the majority of Americans would never support. For example the draft, higher taxes, and war bonds. And since Americans (for the most part) are unwilling to accept any burden or inconvenience of their daily routines -- we have no business being at war in Iraq. The last thing I would want to see is a draft. In my opinion a draft would would target poor and middle-class kids while the 5 Romney brothers stay home, and the likes of them get deferment after deferment after deferment. This piece was written to challenge stay-at-home war supporters. As always, I appreciate your comments.

V/R
John

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 07/23/2008
- jeanrenoir See Profile I'm a Fan of jeanrenoir permalink

We can't take responsibility for the whole future of Iraq. The surge, along the a strengthened Iraqi army and police, have now made it possible, according to Maliki himself, for America to start an orderly withdrawal as soon as Obama takes office. Why in the world not? Israel wants us to stay in Iraq forever. That's why the neocons hatched this absurd and completely unnecessary war anyway, for the supposed safety of Israel, not us, as well as profits for Big Oil, of course. Israel wants to control Iraqi air bases to pose a long-term threat to Iran to keep Iran in check as best it can. But to allow Israel to keep us in Iran forever is the ultimate in the tail wagging the dog. Time to get out, by the Obama-Maliki timetable, not stay in to protect Israel in Iraq forever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 07/21/2008
- John Bruhns - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of John Bruhns permalink

jeanrenoir,

Thanks for your comment. Hence the part of my oped where I wrote:

"Don't get me wrong. I'm not suggesting that we continue the war. If it were up to me the troops would've been home yesterday."

V/R
John

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 PM on 07/22/2008
- LizM See Profile I'm a Fan of LizM permalink

Busted again...feel free to call me an idiot. I'm always getting in trouble for not reading a post correctly...I should have known better but I have no good excuses so I'm not even gonna try...please accept my sincerest apologies!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 07/22/2008
- LizM See Profile I'm a Fan of LizM permalink

I have to disagree that what needs to happen in Iraq is impossible. It just hasn't been tried yet. And, for the life of me, I cannot understand why. What also remains a mystery to me is that neither Barack Obama nor John McCain have demonstrated that they understand the first thing about what will be required to end the civil war in Iraq and withdraw US troops without leaving a failed state in their wake. They are both going to have to find a VP who does - and that's all there is to it!!!

....continued...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 07/21/2008
- John Bruhns - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of John Bruhns permalink

LizM,

What I said was that it is "un-American" to inflict our views on the Iraqis at gunpoint, and impossible.

"But creating an entirely new socialization process for the Iraqis in an effort to achieve a modern and sustainable democracy to our liking is not only un-American -- it's impossible."

V/R
John

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 07/22/2008
- LizM See Profile I'm a Fan of LizM permalink

I can't even post a reply properly...it's been a long day... :-(

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 07/22/2008
- LizM See Profile I'm a Fan of LizM permalink

...continued...damn this 250 word limit....250 words?!

Is Iraq so different from the rest of us out in the world that they would have no part of a diplomatic surge to jump start a process whereby the warring Iraqi factions could be brought to the negotiating table to hammer out their political future? I mean, if it worked in Bosnia why on God's green earth should it not be at least TRIED in Iraq. It seems to me that the Iraqi people are owed at least that much.

What in the world goes on in that monstrosity known as a US Embassy in Baghdad if they are not working to set up a process for a muscular diplomatic effort to find a political solution. You know what - I don't even want an answer to that particular question - I'd rather not know what they've been up to. I already know that they tried to sabotage the only strategy that they have ever seen for a reversal of US policy in Iraq through the promotion of a sustainable political settlement based on federalism and Iraq's own constitution.

And so, if the US is not about working toward a political solution with Iraqis and their neighbours and the major powers under the auspices of the UN, then why should anyone care if there has been some limited success in Iraq which may or may not be attributable to the surge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 07/21/2008
- martinchill See Profile I'm a Fan of martinchill permalink

this post is swimming in contradictions.

you failed to note the success of the tactic of paying both sides lots of money during 'the surge'. that also cannot be sustained indefinitely.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 07/21/2008
- John Bruhns - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of John Bruhns permalink

You're wrong:

We recently gave control of Anbar to the Sunnis. Sure, this is progress, but we must keep in mind that many of these Sunnis are the people who were killing our troops for years.

The government of Iraq has now said that the U.S. must set a timetable to start withdrawing our troops -- well and good. But the Mahdi Army remains strong and very much intact. And Iran enjoys tremendous influence over the Shias -- the same ethnic group that holds a majority of the population.

In addition, most Iraqi cities have underdeveloped civil administrations and an astonishing lack of the economic diversity needed to satisfy the many sectarian groups that are still active participants in Iraq's civil war.

We've built barriers around communities in Baghdad where there's still an existing Sunni vs. Shia rift. Thousands of former insurgent fighters with American blood on their hands are now on the U.S. payroll as security guards. And despite the Iraqi Security Force's increased capability, their desire to be nonsectarian is still very questionable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 07/22/2008
- itmaybetoolate See Profile I'm a Fan of itmaybetoolate permalink

John,

You have hit the nail on the head when you say our goal is impossible. Nation building is impossible from the outside, especially when dealing with a culture as old as that found in Iraq. Religious divisions are real, deeply emotional, and cannot be "healed" militarily, or politically, for that matter. And, if we cannot even build a workable physical infrastructure, how can anyone believe we can build a functioning social infrastructure?

So, what is the solution? the bush administration has left us with no good choices and the "we broke it, we fix it" idea is absurd! WE cannot fix this. We simply cannot. Our best choice at this point is to protect our own - remove our soldiers from harm's way - bring them home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 07/21/2008
- John Bruhns - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of John Bruhns permalink

itmaybetoolate,

Yes, you and I are still on the same page, very much indeed. Good to hear from you again.

V/R
John

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 07/22/2008
- oldpotsmuggler See Profile I'm a Fan of oldpotsmuggler permalink

Muqtada Al Sadr is at Ayatollah school in Iran just so that he can continue, on his terms, the civil war that we would prefer to believe is over. When we leave, he'll be ready and it will happen.

On the other hand, in a "nation" armed to the teeth and populated by folks ready, able, and willing to die in armed fighting there may not really be any such thing as "victims", and certainly no sitting ducks.

I expect that it will get ugly, but the only real choices seem to be "ugly sooner" or "ugly later".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 07/21/2008
- John Bruhns - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of John Bruhns permalink

oldpotsmuggler,

Yes, a real dilemma.

V/R
John

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 07/22/2008
- krocklin See Profile I'm a Fan of krocklin permalink

Wait a minute. I thought we were fighting them there so we won't have to fight them here, right?

As soon as we turn our back the alligator will swim ashore. That's what I heard them say on Cspan at a Conservative convention last year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 07/21/2008
- John Bruhns - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of John Bruhns permalink

krocklin,

They were always wrong.

V/R
John

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 07/22/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Related Tags