iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Shakira

Shakira

Posted: April 30, 2010 07:48 PM

Arizona and Our Future

What's Your Reaction:

For the past days I have been troubled and continue to struggle internally with law 1070. As a Latina and as someone who believes in equality, I am deeply concerned about the impact Arizona's new immigration law will have on hard-working Latino families.

So, I decided to fly to Phoenix yesterday and see the situation first hand. I went to raise awareness about its dangerous consequences and offer my support to the Latino community and to those who defend human rights.

I'm not a citizen of the United States, but I've always been an admirer and defender of its principles. To the rest of the world, the United States represents the dream of a better life based on justice and freedom for everyone -- no matter the color of your skin. This law goes against those values and against the principles of every American I know.

I love America, and what America inspires in all of us. The knowledge that there were countries like America where opportunities exist and where everything is possible with, as President Roosevelt once said, "a bit of courage, hard work, self mastery and intelligent effort" inspired me, and so many millions of others, to try to succeed.

I don't want to see this law tarnish what this country stands for. If it goes into effect in the next few months, it will not only hurt thousands of hard working Latino families in Arizona, it will also hurt the spirits of the entire Latino community -- each of the 45 million Latinos who live and work in the U.S. and who help make this a better nation.

I can't help but wonder what the thousands of Hispanic soldiers who are overseas risking their lives serving this country might feel when they hear that a cousin or even their own mother or father have been detained in the street or arrested for not carrying documentation.

Are they supposed to hang their uniforms or keep on fighting?

This law not only hurts the whole state of Arizona but the fundamental core values of America, the fabric of society itself. The true victory of a democratic nation is when its people can walk the streets without fear. I'm sure if the founding fathers were witnesses today they would oppose Governor Brewer and urge this nation to protect the constitution they fought so hard to build.

Can anyone call a law that singles out all Latinos because of the color of their skin and leaves them vulnerable to abuse legal and constitutional?

Other states have already begun working on similarly unjust and unequal laws. If these laws are allowed to stand, they will deprive people of protection from the government and access to vital services like state hospitals, food and child care programs. It will divert police resources away from keeping families safe and it will hurt the businesses and communities that depend on Latinos.

Yesterday, I met with Latina women who have been victims of domestic violence. With tears in their eyes, they asked me what they were supposed to do to defend themselves or their children from their abusers now that the state has turned its back on them. Under the new law, they will be unable to go to a shelter or call the police to report the harm inflicted on them and their families for fear of being harassed or arrested.

America's greatness has been forged by the dreams of its immigrants. If it is progress and growth we want, we can't afford to crush those dreams. This law won't bring safety or protect America; it will cause chaos. It won't create unity; it will create division. It won't bring about progress; it will set us back.

It's understandable that in times of economic crisis fear and confusion take over -- people look for someone to blame -- but let's not forget what Latinos have given to this country and the workforce that they signify. Latino immigrants, with and without papers, have generated wealth and economic growth in the United States for generations.

It is a misconception that Latino immigrants take away employment opportunities. On the contrary, we help generate them. In part, it is the tireless work of Latino laborers that has prevented many American companies from leaving the country and moving manufacturing to markets like China. The sweat of these workers creates economic growth and more opportunities for all.

Some of the darkest moments in human history -- persecution of Jewish people, segregation in the American South and ethnic cleansing around the world -- began just like this, with governments singling out groups of people and discriminating against them. It is this kind of discrimination that Lincoln, Kennedy and Martin Luther King fought against. Let's not undo their work.

Yesterday during our meeting in Arizona, Holocaust expert Dr. Michael Berenbaum said:

"We don't live in Nazi Germany and we won't provided that America remains faithful to what makes us the United States of America. It is precisely in times of economic dislocation when a country should return to its fundamental principles."

When I see leaders like Mayor Gordon and others who have decided to stand against this law, to defend human dignity and civil rights, it makes me believe in the America Dr. Berenbaum talks about, the America I've always loved.

Before I left Arizona I also met with some of the hard-working families whose dreams are being threatened. Families that will be torn apart by this law:

  • Parents whose son is fighting for the U.S. as an Army medic in Iraq who may not be here when he returns
  • A young girl -- a U.S. citizen -- who may be left alone because her parents are taken from her
  • A student with perfect grades whose dream of college is now in doubt.

I stand beside these, and all American families who believe in basic fairness and human rights.

Those of us who are singers are not knowledgeable enough to talk about the intricacies of the law. But I do know that a constitution exists to defend the rights of all people living in a nation, with or without documents. I do know that the United States Constitution is the envy of many free societies around the world.

Millions of people have fought and died for these rights, most importantly the Americans who created them. I sincerely hope that this law is not the beginning of a new wave of discrimination that undermines the freedoms they fought for.

To Mayor Gordon, President Obama and all the other leaders who have stepped forward to condemn this unjust law, thank you for your leadership and your commitment to America's founding principles.

To the Latino community and all other Americans who oppose this law, please know that I will be with you. Let's keep our spirits up, stay united and protect one another, now more than ever. We've got to join forces and struggle until Congress and the Supreme Court find a just, humanitarian solution to the issue of undocumented immigrants in this country.

To the members of Congress and policy makers, I ask Republicans and Democrats alike to come together and protect the spirit of America.

If there is no problem allowing Latino immigrants to clean our cities, watch over our cars, build our homes, manufacture our products, add to our culture, or drive new business and innovation, then there must be the courage to normalize their situation.

I hope America can find that courage, if only for the sake of the human condition: because we are all equal before God and before the law. Let's hope America lives up to the example and message of equality and freedom that this great country has shared with the rest of the world.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 793
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
11:27 PM on 05/04/2010
I agree that employers need to be held responsible and fined. I agree that illegal immigrants are treated like slaves and paid slave wages. But blaming everything on the employers is like saying "There was a drug dealer on the corner and it's his fault that I bought the drugs". Ridiculous. It takes two to tango.

Is it so hard for the Libs to admit it is not moral to do something illegal? Put that in your moral pipe and smoke it.

Kudos to AZ and any State that wants to follow FEDERAL LAW. And yes, I'd say this for the Swedish Bikini team if their are a bunch of illegal aliens. Boot their areses out of here if they didn't come here legally.
05:43 AM on 05/03/2010
If they wanted to control illegal immigration, they would control the employers who are breaking the law. They could do it. The laws are on the books.
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
02:50 PM on 05/03/2010
And what nobody is pointing out in this regard SN1070 makes provision for officials not doing their job and applying the full extent of the law to be sued for derilection of duty?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
supertim
01:01 AM on 05/03/2010
you thought it was bad now under jan brewer....i cant imagine what arizona would be like under
Governor Joe Arpaio........be afraid, be very afraid!

Election 2010
Joe Arpaio Will Run for Governor, Claims ABC 15; Paperwork "Filled Out and is Ready to File"
http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/04/joe_arpaio_will_run_for_govern.php

"ABC 15 is reporting that Arpaio already has made the decision to take the plunge and will announce his candidacy on Monday.

According to "several high-ranking sources within the Sheriff's Department," all the necessary paperwork "has been filled out and is ready to file."

http://www.abc15.com/content/news/blogs/story/Sources-say-Arpaio-will-announce-run-for-governor/F51eKWaaTE21_FC-V4o4cA.cspx
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
supertim
01:14 AM on 05/03/2010
Actually, it's not news that Pearce craves the post of sheriff. When Arpaio first ran back in 1992, he vowed to serve only one term. Many assumed that his Chief Deputy Russell Pearce was his heir apparent.

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2010/03/russell_pearce_for_sheriff_yes.php
10:47 AM on 05/03/2010
Good on him. I'd even vote for him for President if I could -- I like the idea of a politician who actually respects and enforces the law. Obama is an epic fail on that score; his Department of Justice is but a naked courtesan to power.
holyghostie
Spiritus est qui vivificat
10:31 PM on 05/02/2010
Shakira please write your next column asking Mexico to amend its constitution so that legal and illegal immigrants are treated less harshly than the current practice.

Shakira please ask the Mexican Gov't to change the law that says a Mexican citizen can place an illegal immigrant under citizens arrest.

Please ask the Mexican Border patrol to stop using machine guns on the southern border, and arrest those officers who routinely rob, beat and in some cases strip the Honduran and Guatemalan migrants that ride the train north.

Until you do this you are holding the USA to a standard that no Hispanic Country currently has, and that is an OPEN BORDER that looks the other way against transgressors.
10:49 AM on 05/03/2010
I've asked my Congresscritter to propose that we adopt Mexican immigration law in toto.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jack Swalley
09:54 PM on 05/02/2010
As in California, this too shall go away when enough people UNELECT those that bring this nonsense.
We have the right, no, the duty to stop whining and get rid of the flat out racists in control of ONE political party.
10:01 PM on 05/02/2010
both major parties are owned by the same handful of offshore bankers
09:42 PM on 05/02/2010
The issue is not about equality, hard work, fairness or even immigration. Our immigration systems works just fine. Millions of legal immigrants have come to this Country and made it better. It is about illegal immigration and the violations of US law by people who do not believe in the rule of law (just look at Mexico today). There is no right to enter this Country illegaly. When a husband & wife who are American citizens commit crimes, they get seperated from their children not because the laws are unfair but because they broke the law and that has consequences. The writer wants illegal immigrants not to suffer the same consequences. This Country belongs to its citizens and they decide who comes in, who stays and who gets deported. That is fair, it is just and it is right. No amnesty to law breakers. Seriously fines to employers who employ illegals, cut off of all taxpayer financed government services and cut off of Federal funds to municipalities who offer amnesty. Most illegals will go back to where they belong. Those who stay should be deported.
05:45 AM on 05/03/2010
I agree, fine and jail the employers. They are Americans who should be obeying the law, not weakening their country by breaking laws just to be able to exploit people with slave wages and slave working conditions. They are the villains here.
09:33 PM on 05/02/2010
This immigration law is violating American Civil Law by:

4th amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The AZ law is not only violating the ethnic American Civil Rights by the 4th amendments (if you don’t believe so, then what is the “probable cause?” But is too violating our 8th Amendment by CRUELY punishing ethnic people by forcing Americans to show their papers, which violates out 4th amendment

8th Amendment: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


Gov. Jan Brewer (R-AZ) doesn't know what an "illegal immigrant" looks like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2VSGEWzEW0

How is it not violating American Civil Rights, if the law’s base begins with our rights being violated as Americans’? ANYONE?
09:52 PM on 05/02/2010
Americans have to show their 'papers' are the frickin time.....under the law, the cop can only be engaged with someone for something else first- this something else is expected to usually be a traffic stop. the cop sees a busted tail light, for instance, and pulls over the driver ( for simplification sake, lets assume the driver is alone).....the cop is within his right to ask for a driving permit. Under the law, thats enough- a driving permit is all that is required . the mental wheels in the cops head cannot turn, wondering if this guy is illegally here, since the driver has produced the proper document. there will be no questions asked concerning citizenship status.

Now- if the busted light man cannot produce any ID and cannot reasonably explain why he doesnt have any legit ID... that is 'reasonable suspicion' enough to think that this person is here in the country illegally.

that 8th amendment stuff is baloney too.....its not excesive to fine someone $500 bucks , or jail them for six months , and/or deport them, if they illegally broke into this country.

PS- about 45% of all the cops enforcing this law will be hispanic
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
03:41 PM on 05/03/2010
Why dont you get down off your soap box and resarch the 14th amendment - that about covers what you are ranting about. Immigration and legal status issues have been a hot topic since the civil war and latinos feel they are being targeted unfairly?

These issues have been tested and I am sure will be tested again. Minority rights ARE derived form the constitution and the law not taken away. Amendment 14 speaks exactly to this situation and affords all aleins (legal and illegal) the same protections as citizens under the constitution and the law!
08:22 PM on 05/02/2010
Does this mean she will pick up the annual 38 billion welfare tab for illegals
05:46 AM on 05/03/2010
Employers of illegals are the villains. Predatory thieves who are breaking the law. Fine and jail them. There would be no illegals if there were no jobs for them.
07:40 PM on 05/02/2010
Well said. Don't mind the haters ... just laugh at them and their comments like I do. Silly Americans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ibarkquietly
07:31 PM on 05/02/2010
Shakira said "Those of us who are singers are not knowledgeable enough to talk about the intricacies of the law. "

So let's generalize and get it wrong as long as our political conclusions match our constituency.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
07:30 PM on 05/02/2010
Welcome to the America you have not yet met, the country that a certain right wing wants to totally destroy our current constitution by reconstructing there own , if Americans allow them to do so that old America you used to know will die.
07:36 PM on 05/02/2010
quite a vague phrasing, dont ya think? if the law mirrors federal law, then are you up in arms against that?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
07:45 PM on 05/02/2010
Only the right wing radicals can scream for there freedoms while out of the other side of there mouths you want to take certain freedoms away!
guajiro
posted 5 minutes ago
08:18 PM on 05/02/2010
It may be that, in the case of immigration, the State of Arizona cannot enforce Federal law.
07:30 PM on 05/02/2010
the illegals and their families are just using the race card so they can cut in line and get amnesty.
07:38 PM on 05/02/2010
thats exactly right. the open borders people know that that is the perfect club by which to shut up debate.

but were not suppose to know that latino pro amnesty groups are about as racist as they come...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cbat
08:17 PM on 05/02/2010
Really just how are they racists, by standing up for their rights. Explain,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cbat
08:20 PM on 05/02/2010
Arizona, republcian party and rest of the right wingnuts made it about race. If they are so concerned about illegal immigration, then they should be concerned with all immigrants coming to this country, not just the brown ones.

Accuse your opponent of what you are already doing, right.
08:55 PM on 05/02/2010
the law doesnt talk about skin color.
who do you expect cops to nab along the border, irish nuns?
07:04 PM on 05/02/2010
While I disagree with the law, your diatribe is factually incorrect on several points, but what disturbs me the most is how you seem to be purposely misleading your intended readers.

You are incorrect in your statement;
"Can anyone call a law that singles out all Latinos because of the color of their skin and leaves them vulnerable to abuse legal and constitutional?
You imply that all Latinos are of a darker pigmentation. This is quite false as we define Latino or hispanic as culture and people of countries formerly ruled by Spain, usually with a majority of the population speaking the Spanish language. As you well know, the ethnic make up and and ancestry of latinos varies widely, ie from European ancestry to those of western african ancestry.

You then go on to state that illegal immigrants "have generated wealth and economic growth in the United States for generations.", as well as "It is a misconception that Latino immigrants take away employment opportunities. On the contrary, we help generate them."

Academic research suggests otherwise;
Over the past few 15 - 20 years these "undesirable" jobs were from mostly agriculture related sectors. Now, according to National Public Radio, about 3 percent of illegal immigrants work in agriculture; 33 percent have jobs in service industries; and substantial numbers can be found in construction and related occupations (16 percent), and in production, installation, and repair (17 percent). Would most americans and LEGAL immigrants consider these sectors undesirable? I think not.
07:23 PM on 05/02/2010
What's more, research by both George Borjas, Professor of Economics at Harvard and Paul Samuelson, Nobel Prize economist from MIT has shown that illegal immigration had a substantial effect on reducing the economic status of U.S. poor while benefiting middle class individuals and wealthier Americans. Their research suggests that real wages of US workers without a high school degree declined by 9% from 1980-2000 due to competition from illegal immigrant workers.

"Those of us who are singers are not knowledgeable enough to talk about the intricacies of the law" you should follow your advice and take it a step further to include not make, claims that are in contradiction to academics spending more than 10 mins studying this issue. I understand your eagerness to stand up for what you believe is right, however, for you to use your celebrity as a soapbox for this kind of misleading rhetoric is disingenuous and wrong.
guajiro
posted 5 minutes ago
06:45 PM on 05/02/2010
The drug gangs and the drug cartels are jumping with joy at the passage of bill 1070. For those of you who have watched "48 Hours", do you remember how the murders are solved? 99% of the time the investigators question the neighbors and neighborhood of where the crime/murder occurreds to get information as to who did it, who was involved, etc. It is practically the only way these crimes get solved; by the cooperation of the community. If people in these neighborhoods think the law officers are going to arrest them, and by this law the official MUST arrest them if he has "reasonable suspicion" they are illegal, then why in the world would they even talk to an officer? They wouldn't and they won't. Lazy minds always come up with half-baked ideas.
07:21 PM on 05/02/2010
Wrong.....go read the law like I have. There is a provision within the law for just such a scenario as you described. if to enforce the law that would jeapardize police work in a case, then the new law wouldnt have to be enforced
guajiro
posted 5 minutes ago
07:56 PM on 05/02/2010
I just read the bill and it doesn't contain the exception you claim. No surprise you didn't post a link to support your claim. The nearest I could find was under HB2162. What it says is as follows: ---" Another modification to the original bill indicated that violations of local civic ordinances may give local officials reason to question immigration status,[25] but explicitly limits the right to determine such status to law enforcement officers authorized by the federal government.[21]". As you can see it does not provide for any excuse for ANY law enforcement to not enforce the sb1070 law.
06:14 PM on 05/02/2010
Should we just open the border and let everyone in?
05:43 AM on 05/03/2010
No one seems to be advocating that.