More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sharmine Narwani

GET UPDATES FROM Sharmine Narwani

In Lebanon, The Plot Thickens

Posted: 09/03/11 07:15 PM ET

The Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), the UN Security Council-initiated investigation into the February 14, 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, formally unveiled its indictment of four alleged Hezbollah "supporters" last week.

There was nothing new in this document. Almost all details had been leaked to various media outlets at separate intervals since 2009.

But it is a compelling read nonetheless. There is no longer any need for conjecture, supposition or doubt -- the heart of the case against the accused is now spelled out in black and white.

A Case Built Entirely on Telecommunications Data
The Tribunal's case appears to be built on a simple premise: the "co-location" of cellular phones -- traceable to the accused four -- that coincide heavily with Hariri's whereabouts and crucial parts of the murder plot in the six weeks prior to his death.

Using Call Data Records (CDRs) -- which track incoming and outgoing calls, time, date, duration, and importantly, the location from which calls are made (identifiable by the nearby "cell towers" that carry a mobile phone call) -- the STL identified a covert network of mobile phones called the "Red Network" used in the planning of the assassination.

The Tribunal reveals that CDR analysis links the Red Network to four other colour-coded cell phone networks, some of which are non-covert, i.e. the Personal Mobile Phones (PMPs) of the indictees. In short, what this means is that the suspected covert phone networks (Red, Blue and Green) were very frequently making calls from the same areas as the personal mobile phones of the four accused men.

Indeed, the frequency of the various phone call-overlaps between the covert Hariri-tracking networks and the personal phones of the indictees make this appear to be a slam-dunk case. How could any of this be coincidence?

Not So Fast...
But there isn't a literate soul in Lebanon who does not know that the country's telecommunications networks are highly infiltrated -- whether by competing domestic political operatives or by foreign entities. For its part, the Lebanese resistance group Hezbollah -- with which the indictees are allegedly affiliated -- has spent much of the past year explaining in painstaking detail the hazards of relying on telecom data that is readily penetrable by the state's enemies.

This narrative has been backed by Lebanese officials, convicted "spies" and outed employees of telecom companies.

So how does this impact the STL's meticulous circumstantial case to unravel the conspiracy behind Hariri's death?

Conspiracy Theory #1: On the one hand, Hezbollah supporters may very well have assassinated Rafiq Hariri -- whether through direct orders from the resistance group's leadership or in conjunction with other individuals or governments.

Conspiracy Theory #2: On the other hand, the telecommunication analysis provided by the Tribunal could instead represent an intricately planned and executed effort to frame Hezbollah.

It could go something like this:

Assume for a moment that there was in fact a genuine Hezbollah surveillance operation to track the whereabouts of Hariri. This, in itself, is not unusual -- it is widely assumed in the Middle East that political camps engage in this kind of monitoring activities of key figures. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah last summer even televised intercepted Israeli video footage tracking Hariri's various routes to and from Beirut in the time period leading up to his death. No biggie, right?

Caveat: In this scenario, the Hezbollah operatives use their personal mobile phones during their surveillance ops. They have no covert phones as suggested by the Tribunal's colour-coded networks theory. In fact, the colour-coded networks and their history of phone calls don't even really exist -- they have been entirely fabricated and then cleverly co-located with the Hezbollah PMPs by an unknown entity that hacked into cell tower data logs.

Or assume instead that the assassination plot is entirely accurate as outlined by the STL. There were indeed colour-coded covert networks led by the Red Network to carry out the dirty deed -- only no Hezbollah operatives were involved.

Caveat: In this scenario, an unknown entity has simply co-located targeted Hezbollah-supporter PMPs with the colour-coded Networks to make it seem as though there is a connection with these individuals.

Crazy Conspiracy Theories?
To suggest, however, that the Tribunal's theory is meritless, means that a conspiring "entity" had to obtain the deepest access into Lebanese telecommunications networks at one or -- more likely -- several points along the data logging trail of a mobile phone call. They would have to be able to intercept data and alter or forge it, and then, importantly, remove all traces of the intervention.

But here's where "unlikely" crashes into "bizarre." In the past year, several employees of the state-owned Lebanese telecommunications operator Alpha have been arrested for providing foreign entities with access into their networks.

Charbel Qazzi, an Alpha department manager is under investigation for providing Israeli agents with passwords to access his company's networks and cell towers from outside Lebanon.

Tarek Rabaa, an Alpha network engineer, has reportedly confessed to providing foreign intelligence agents with maps of Lebanese telecom networks, network settings and details of product components used in cell towers -- information relevant to Lebanon's other state-owned MTC telecom company too. Critically, Rabaa has admitted to -- at the specific request of his contact agent -- blocking the purchase of more secure Chinese-made Huawei equipment, while recommending the procurement of products that are more easily compromised.

According to leading Lebanese daily Al Akhbar which published the phone numbers redacted in the Tribunal's indictment, all cell phones in the covert Red and Green Networks are Alpha numbers, with the other networks a mix of Alpha and MTC phones.

A 2011 Rand Report commissioned by the U.S. Air Force confirms that in the six years following it's 2000 withdrawal from Lebanon, Israel was actively tracking Hezbollah's cellular footprints: "Among other things, those organizations (Mossad and AMAN) carefully tracked various Hezbollah leaders by their given names, noms de guerre, addresses, cellular telephone numbers and radio call signs."

But this is of little surprise to industry watchers. As recently as last October, the general assembly of the world's leading industry standards organization, the 124-nation International Telecommunications Union (ITU), passed a resolution condemning past and present acts of "piracy, interference and interruption, and sedition by Israel against Lebanon's fixed and cellular telephone networks."

Nobody doubts Israel's capacity to carry out this telecom sleight of hand -- technology warfare is an entrenched part of the nation's military strategies. This task would lie somewhere between the relatively facile telephone hacking of the News of the World reporters and the infinitely more complex Stuxnet attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, in which Israel is a prime suspect.

And the fact is that Hezbollah is an early adherent to the concept of cyberwarfare. The resistance group have built their own nationwide fiber optics network to block enemy eavesdropping, and have demonstrated their own ability to intercept covert Israeli data communications. To imagine that they then used traceable mobile phones to execute the murder of the century is a real stretch. Even journalists in Beirut use multiple SIM cards and remove batteries from cell phones to escape basic tracking and monitoring activities.

M-O-T-I-V-E
Assuming that the Tribunal's conspiracy theory is on target, the question remains why would Hezbollah's leadership want to kill Hariri?

When investigating crimes of this nature, one looks to identify suspects by examining modus operandi and motive as well as a slew of other likely give-aways. This kind of over-the-top detonation of explosives by a suicide bomber in a crowded public place packed with civilians is simply not Hezbollah's style -- even Western diplomats in Beirut agree with this.

On the critical issue of "motive" however, there is even more head scratching that goes on here. Usually, the narrative that assigns motive for this crime to Hezbollah goes something like this: Syria's President Bashar al-Assad, a close ally of Hezbollah, was at loggerheads with Hariri, had threatened him several times, and was furious at the former Lebanese PM for allegedly spearheading UN Security Council Resolution 1559 which created the basis for removing Syrian troops from Lebanese territory. Except that this narrative ignores the fact that Hezbollah is nobody's hit-squad -- again, our media's oft-misleading conjecture aside -- and has a Lebanese agenda quite separate from Assad's grand plans for Syria.

A very interesting tidbit that has quietly emerged in the years since Hariri's assassination reveals that, in spite of public adversarial agendas, a growing camaraderie had blossomed between Nasrallah and the former Lebanese prime minister in the six months before his untimely demise. During these talks, the men had apparently come to an understanding about Hezbollah's retention of its weapons arsenal, further removing a motive for murder.

In a shocking video leak of the Security Council-backed investigative Commission's interview of former Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri -- son of the slain Rafiq -- the younger Hariri throws a wrench in the "motive" works by revealing to investigators that his father and Nasrallah had "opened a door" recently: "My father trusted Hassan Nasrallah a lot and he thought he could work with him... he thought that Hassan Nasrallah was a man of his word."

The secret weekly meetings between the two men took place in Dahiyeh, the heavily Shia suburb of southern Beirut, and Hezbollah assumed sole responsibility for Hariri's safety during these clandestine visits. This would have been a huge leap of faith for someone as security conscious as Hariri, who travelled with a large contingency of bodyguards in armour-plated vehicles equipped with signal-jamming devices.

And it would certainly have provided Hezbollah with ample opportunity to do away with Hariri in a less provocative manner, if the group was so inclined.

Motive? Another way to look at this might be to ask who would most fear a fast friendship developing between Lebanon's most popular Shia and Sunni leaders?

All the telecommunications analysis in the world will not convince a large part of the Lebanese population that the data is "clean." Perhaps it is unfortunate that the STL's case happens to be based on what is viewed as a highly-compromised sector and, as the indictment reads, "built in large part on circumstantial evidence."

In the final analysis, after invasions, occupations and a wretched civil war, Lebanon will most likely resist being torn apart again over evidence this flimsy.

A version of this article was first published on Al Jazeera on August 31, 2011

Visit Sharmine's blog: Mideast Shuffle

Become a Facebook fan of Sharmine Narwani

 

Follow Sharmine Narwani on Twitter: www.twitter.com/snarwani

The Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), the UN Security Council-initiated investigation into the February 14, 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, formally unveiled its i...
The Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), the UN Security Council-initiated investigation into the February 14, 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, formally unveiled its i...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:08 PM on 09/09/2011
The STL is politics, pure and simple. All Lebanese know this. Lebanon has a long history of political assassinations that the U.N. has routinely ignored. Why such selective interest in Hariri? Because vilifying Hezbollah serves the U.S./israel's agenda, which is to create discord between Shiites and Sunnis.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madsen26
12:16 PM on 09/07/2011
The evidence may be circumstantial and very open to interpretation, as this blog suggests. However, it also needs to be put in the wider context of a whole spate of political assassinations of figures that were either in opposition to Hepzbollah and/or the Syrian presence in Lebanese politics and territory. Most of these came after the Hariri assassination, and really when you take them all together they do form a picture which is an indictment of most likely the Syrian regime, working through covert parties on the ground in Lebanon. Some may have just been undercover Syrian agents, some may have been actual Hepzbollah members. The point is, that the most visible way to draw a line under all these murders is through the Hariri case.
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
05:25 PM on 09/08/2011
Indictments must be based on facts, not speculation, hypothesis, or fantasy. Morevoer, that point is that this Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) indictment is a hoax.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madsen26
06:50 PM on 09/08/2011
Indictments can be based on overwhelming circumstantial evidence. One of which is, the words of the Syrian president himself. He left it to his brother to work out the details. There are no other parties with that type of distinct interest in assassinating Sunni and Christian politicians in Lebanon. If it was one assassination, then you could speculate it might be a ploy by another party such as Israel. On this occasion, I just don't think so. The trail leads to one direction and that's Shia and Syria.
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
07:47 AM on 09/07/2011
Tribunal Concealed Evidence Al-Qaeda Cell Killed Hariri
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/09/01/tribunal-concealed-evidence-al-qaeda-cell-killed-hariri/
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sharmine Narwani
04:50 PM on 09/07/2011
The article you cite - by Gareth Porter - is a must-read. Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Houston
British and a London resident
07:13 AM on 09/07/2011
I could never understand why Hezbollah was accused of the Murder. As for Syrian involvement, if it was Syria, all it did was to accelerate the withdrawal from Lebanon. Not the sort of behavior you would expect if the Syrians were involved. As for the interceptions of mobile telephony, well it would seem the users of the phones were pretty clueless. Surely they would have got hold of some anonymous "pay as you go" phones, even the daftest, low life drugs dealer knows to do that, let alone people who could plan this sort of operation. There are to many questions which need urgent answers in Lebanon such as the killing of Bachir Gemayel or the killing of Elie Hobeika three days prior to him giving testimony before a Belgium court about the Sabra and Shatila massacres.
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
05:59 PM on 09/06/2011
What's clear is that the US government has been lying over and over and over again by accusing Syria in order to force UN sanctions against Syria.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
10:44 PM on 09/06/2011
Yes, and the US must be manufacturing all those videos of the Syrian army shooting civilians in the streets.

Wow, the US is soooooo talented.
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
05:44 PM on 09/06/2011
Great article Sharmine. Also Patrick Cockburn pointed at a biased investigation in his article "The Hariri Assassination Indictment Based on Flawed Premise" in Counterpunch, suggesting that the perpetrators could be members of Al-Qaeda instead.

http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/08/30/the-hariri-assassination-2/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
10:45 PM on 09/06/2011
Of they could be Martians.

Without any evidence whatsoever, you might say it's Barbie and Ken!!!
03:22 PM on 09/06/2011
All of this can be used by the defendants at trial to oppose the prosecution. NOne of it justifies the defendants from flipping the international community the bird and threatening to ignite a war in lebanon if anyone tries to enforce the subpoena. Hezballah is a bunch of thugs run by a war lord.
12:39 PM on 09/06/2011
This article is just as biased, misleading, and uninformative as it was when the author posted it on al jazeera. Posting to a third or fourth site will not make it any more objective.

This is a personal take on the news, not an objective report on it, and it should be clearly identified as such.
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
05:49 PM on 09/06/2011
This article is very informative, spot on and very well researched. Many articles are published in many places which doesn't diminish its veracity, and Al Jazeera has one of the best reporting about the Middle East in the world. Certainly much better than US mainstream media.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
10:45 PM on 09/06/2011
Very informative....if you like crazy, evidence-free conspiracy theories.
photo
Yank in France
Thomas Paine, expat in France 1792-1802
04:33 AM on 09/05/2011
If Hezbullah is so clean, why are they refusing to cooperate with the International Tribunal and why are they preventing the Lebanese govt from doing so?

I am a strong critic of Israel, but Hezbullah has created a state within a state that is destroying Lebanon. The organization has already dragged Lebanon into one war against its will!

It is one thing to oppose the Israelis, but quite another to stupidly support a totalitarian and ultra sectarian militia that is destroying what was once a paradise in the Middle East, Lebanon!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce banned
Never let them tell you it can't be done.
11:41 AM on 09/05/2011
Well, let's see, there is that track record of the same people who set up the ITL blocking efforts to bring those involved in the massacres at Shabra and Shatila, and backing the attacks on (wait for it) Hezbollah for the (and here's the kicker) crime of trying to set up a more secure telephone system.

And, if they thought, hey, a group of professional investigators gathering information will result in a report clearing the accused if the evidence points that way, no matter what the more political higher-ups may want, all they had to do was look at the IAEA (which ignores and downplays what its professional investigators on the scenes finds, and instead finds the usually vague, unvarifiable information that those who want a specific finding feed them, even after years of that information turning up false in the end) or the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (you know, the ones that went through Iraq with a fine tooth comb looking for WMDs, which didn't stop the US from declaring that there were WMDs in Iraq ready to fire) and realise that that particular notion sits right beside the life is fair one.
photo
Yank in France
Thomas Paine, expat in France 1792-1802
12:15 PM on 09/05/2011
Richard, I was as disgusted as anyone at the Israeli invasion of Lebanon which resulted in the Shabra and Shatila massacres. Why are you bringing this up to ME?!!

Above all, what is the relationship? I don't recall Hezbullah or any even Amal coming to the Palestinians' rescue. On the contrary, Hezbullah hemmed the Palestinians in their refugee camps.

As for the UN investigation, that has NOTHING to do with the Iraq fiasco and lies. They are NOT the same people and the UN NEVER supported the Iraq invasion. So, I am sorry, but I am concerned about the Lebanese people as a whole and am unwilling to sacrifice their well-being for Hezbullah out of anger at Israel, because they do NOT represent a viable force to take on Israeli aggression.

The truth is that if Syria ever developed a govt with real credibility among the people, they might be able to build the sort of economic, political and even military powerhouse that could stand as a beacon to other Arab states. That is the sort of thing that will make Israel tremble and spark hope in Palestinians' heart, not a band of misfits hell bent on destroying what was once a fantastic country!!
02:46 PM on 09/05/2011
I always appear to disaree with you, Yank, but this time I have the same questions as you have. And, there was not only lack of cooperation, there were threats by Hezbullah to bring the government down if the matter were to be tried, and then they proceeded and did bring the government down, if I remember correctly. Mysterious!
photo
Yank in France
Thomas Paine, expat in France 1792-1802
04:34 PM on 09/05/2011
That is a good point, which cannot be emphasized enough: Hezbullah has BULLIED the Lebanese govt and even used physical force to intimidate its Christian and Sunni opponents!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:32 PM on 09/04/2011
I'm an inveterate TV channel surfer and once came across a BBC interview with PM Hariri.
The BBC's man seemed intent on getting a negative appraisal of Hezbullah from the PM, seeming to harp on the subject over several questions.
Hariri's position was that Hezbullah was a "shield" for Lebanon, however, he did not specify against what it was shield.
After reading your article, Ms Narwani, I wonder if that interview showed the world Rafiq Hariri signing his own death warrant.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:26 PM on 09/04/2011
I guess now that accusations of Judeobolshevism are out of style these days, the paranoid have to adapt and improvise.
photo
wom122
Primum non nocere
12:10 AM on 09/04/2011
The tribunal has continued to pursue a political agenda right from the start. Many leading figures were assassinated in Lebanon over the last 60 years starting with Riad Solh in 1951. In some cases, the assasins hardly bothered to hide their identity and in others the suspicions never translated into indictments but the Hariri tribunal sets a deplorable precedence of indicting without probable cause and proceeding without presumption of innocence. It's as if the tribunal is bent on resurrecting Lebanon's civil war.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce banned
Never let them tell you it can't be done.
11:48 AM on 09/05/2011
I think someone is bent on doing just that (or at least doing it at a low level), but they seem to have miscalculated, seeing as the Lebanese Army no longer sees Hezbollah as a primary threat, the Lebanese government no longer sees Hezbollah as a group it is worth more to oppress than accept, and the Lebanese people no longer think the only way to a country that is connected to the economically growing world is to go through a gate that America controls.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gerald Serlin
Retired lawyer. Perserverantia Vincit
09:35 PM on 09/03/2011
With all of this detailed analysis, why not post your theory of what really happened? I thought for sure that you were going to accuse the Israelis, with the explanation that by killing Heriri, the blame would necessarily fall on Hezeballah and from that Israel would gain. How about it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:25 PM on 09/04/2011
Hi, Gerald
The Romans had a forensic principal "cui bono?" which I think most relevant to the Hariri assassination.
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
08:09 PM on 09/03/2011
So then why did Hezbollah not cooperate with the investigation?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce banned
Never let them tell you it can't be done.
11:56 AM on 09/05/2011
What would it have to gain?

Do you think that with the full co-operation of Hezbollah the ITL would have paid any more attention to the evidence of access to the very records it was relying on by a party who's dedication to delegitimizing and destroying Hezbollah is well known than it did without that co-operation?

Do you think that, even if it had, the US etc. would have paid any more attention to it than they did to the Goldstone report?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
10:50 PM on 09/06/2011
The first sentence says it all. Period.
02:39 PM on 09/05/2011
Not cooperatng is one thing. The threats and as a result change in the government, IF the case were to be tried at all, is another thing. One would think, as this is an internal Lebanese issue, and as murder appears to be *quite common*, placing those who govern, as well as civilians at risk, it would be important to find out the who's, why's and how's.

This blog is just another defense of the pristene innocence and shiny white countenance of those this blogger likes best. However, it apears that she does NOT deliver anything that counters, really, the decision of the Court and its findings. While the methods used are not acceptable to her, they were apparently acceptable to the Court. Everyone is wrong, and they are all Lebanese, except Hezbullah and this blogger. Well, I, for one, will keep tuned to hear the REAL story, as proven by the blogger. Any time now?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:18 PM on 09/03/2011
I lived in Beirut for 14 years, I was 2 blocks away when the explosion hit, and I can still smell the fumes.
Without going into a boring point by point analyst of your article, I can say that without a doubt you wrote a fine article.
From the Prince George Hotel to the then escape club and all stops along the cornice what you have written
…was said, quietly of course
Again, very well written
02:44 PM on 09/05/2011
So, you do agree with the writer, but we are not seeing the fine points on why you agree with her, and not with the decision of the Court. So, things wwere said, quietly, whispered maybe? I am ready to accept your and the writer's conclusions, but am, like all other readers here, kept in the dark by both you and this blogger. Again, I am more than ready to change my mind, but neither you, nor the blogger, delivers anything to convince me. Very well written, maybe, but no cigar as to the objective.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:55 PM on 09/05/2011
I don't want to change your opinion.
2 points of interest, No! 3 I don’t agree or disagree with the court, I only know that from 30 plus years of traveling the world I have no, no respect for anything the UN does, I have seen them in action to many times, next, you must understand the make-up of Lebanese politics, ‘religion’ ‘Religion thy name is Lebanon’ Shi'ites and Sunnis are the two largest Muslim sects, the you have the Druze, Christians and Maronite Catholics, of course you have sub-groups for each. All ministers are appointed based on their religious sect, your call on this one, lastly, to simply write about the intrigue of daily life in Lebanon is almost impossible. To write about Lebanon is one thing, to live through the Syrian control, car bombs, the Israeli situation and the assassination is quite another.
…Did I mention Hezbollah?