My last post, White Women Supporting Hillary: A Paradox at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sheldon-drobny/white-woman-supporting-hi_b_86448.html was really a query rather than a conclusion. Many of the comments from women attacked me for being a sexist. That is not relevant. What I was asking in that post is whether white female Democrats are supporting Hillary based upon gender rather than competence and character. It is a fair question. If the answer is based upon gender, that is wrong. And one additional point should be made. I supported Hillary. Check my post in December in support of her at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sheldon-drobny/the-real-hillary-a-probl_b_77518.html
Anybody who supports a candidate based on something so superficial as their genes and chromosomes is just idiotic.
(i'll add tho, that tons of older women have been bypassed for promotions at work while younger "hotshot" men without experience got the better job, so that's in there too)
Of course, this leaves little of interest to write about. That's the rub.
What if the people you were talking about were elite white men and they were this venomous, dismissive of his experience & condescending to Barack?