More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

On Obama and "Hope"

What's Your Reaction:

As the artist who created the image and poster of then-candidate for president, Barack Obama, with first the word "Progress," and then later, and more appropriately, "Hope," I am frequently asked for my opinion on his presidency so far.

I generally avoid commenting about Obama's performance because I have found that the mainstream media tends to reduce my views to a simplistic position of being either "for" the President or "disappointed" or "against" him. So when I was interviewed last week by an established publication, I spent almost an hour talking to the reporter and trying to articulate my views on Obama and his Presidency to date. It is important to me that my words not be distorted or taken out of context to avoid Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the right-wing media attack machine creating a false storyline.

Yet that is exactly was happened. Sadly, my position was again reduced to "Obama 'Hope' poster artist, losing hope," which is not my opinion. As with millions of other Americans, young and old, my position is far more complex.

Let me state as simply as I can my views on President Obama. I support President Obama. I believe he is an intelligent, compassionate person, with many good policy ideas. If Obama runs for reelection in 2012, I will support him.

And while I wish he was more bold in action on issues of most concern to me -- health care, global warming, the war in Afghanistan, Wall Street reform, education, immigration reform -- I realize he is trying to do the best that he can given the obstructionist, "just say no to anything," opposition he faces from the Republicans in Congress.

And for the record, I have not lost "Hope," in President Obama, even if the change he ran upon is not coming as quickly many of us thought or hoped it might.

I realize Obama was handed the worst economy and political climate facing a president in modern history and that it will take time for our country to recover and begin to move in the right direction. I also realize the Republican party and its leaders have no intention of being constructive partners in trying to solve the difficult problems facing our nation. Unfortunately, the tough economy has created wide spread frustration among Americans resulting in many people looking for a scapegoat. Ironically, Obama has often been the scapegoat when the policies of those who oppose Obama are responsible for many of the hardships the nation is currently facing.

What is also frustrating to me is that the media wants to give readers a narrative of high drama instead engaging them in a broader and richer debate about the issues at stake. The quality of a discussion is determined by the depth and quality of information available to people. As Americans and as readers we have to hold our media as accountable as we hold our elected leaders.

Finally, I'd like to add that I believe that democracy is about more than just voting. I choose to address different political issues with my art, using images to increase awareness, and art sales to raise funds for social causes I care about. We all have outlets for our voices and choices about how we choose to spend our money, whether it's purchasing a fuel efficient hybrid or paying a little extra for electricity from green energy sources. Each of these acts sends a message to our leaders and corporations about the direction we want them to go.

Editor's note: This post was initially published without the concluding paragraph.

 
As the artist who created the image and poster of then-candidate for president, Barack Obama, with first the word "Progress," and then later, and more appropriately, "Hope," I am frequently asked for ...
As the artist who created the image and poster of then-candidate for president, Barack Obama, with first the word "Progress," and then later, and more appropriately, "Hope," I am frequently asked for ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 567
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
01:00 AM on 10/04/2010
Can a right-wing patriot believe that too much blood & money is being wasted on these foreign wars? Can a left-wing moral universalist admit that the Democratic Party isn't out ahead of you on the issues? Can we all rise above the marketing & overcome our brand loyalties? The problems of thepolitical class are not our problems. We have our own!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
10:55 PM on 10/03/2010
Mr. Fairey, do you think eight years will be enough, or do you think we should make him President for Life? Is that enough time for you? Give me a break. He and his party have absolute control of Executive and Legislative branch since he has been in power. He could do whatever he wanted and all he has done is blamed Bush and Reagan. I myself lean towards President Grant as being the problem. The american people are not buying his excuses anymore.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
03:38 PM on 10/17/2010
Everything you say here, except the question about president for life, which is ridiculous, is false. If all you've got is ridiculous and false, why do you write? Oh, I know. To try to gain traction for your untruths, and destroy what little progress there has been. Tell me this: do you disagree with anything the Democratic party has been trying to change, such as lowering the cost of health care and providing coverage to more people? Providing education grants to more students and making paying them back easier? Protecting social security? Advancing the cause of the medical and psychological treatment of veterans? Improving the pay of the military? And even continuing the wars which purport to end terrorism, although badly misguided by people who I have to assume are just like you and have no respect for facts?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
07:01 PM on 10/17/2010
You mean the fact, that it will actually raise the price of Healthcare not lower it as recognized by the CBO and other organizations? One size fits all right? Actually, didn't Gibbs say the Obama administration would like to change the pensions for military personnal. Doesn't sound to me like they want to help the military. As far as Social Security goes, both parties want to protect Social Security by raising the retirement age to 70. Also, you mean ending the Afghanistan war even though as a country they attacked us which is an act of war or the fact that we have won IRAQ as a result of Bush's policy. I like facts as you can see.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
10:50 PM on 10/03/2010
This is a provision in the Healthcare Reform Act. This is part of the reason why come November the American people will have there say on the Democrat's Reign.

On page 25 of 29: TITLE IX REVENUE PROVISIONS- SUBTITLE A: REVENUE OFFSET PROVISIONS-(sec. 9001,
as modified by sec. 10901) Sec.9002 "requires employers to include in the W-2 form of each employee the aggregate cost of applicable employer sponsored group health coverage that isexcludable from the employees gross income."

I will post this again since apparently my post did not show up.

On page 25 of 29: TITLE IX REVENUE PROVISIONS- SUBTITLE A: REVENUE OFFSET PROVISIONS-(sec. 9001,
as modified by sec. 10901) Sec.9002 "requires employers to include in the W-2 form of each employee the aggregate cost of applicable employer sponsored group health coverage that isexcludable from the employees gross income."

I hope you progressive can actually read and understand what this provision of the healthcare bill means. Come next year, any healthcare subsidies provided by your employer will be considered taxable income. I can't even imagine what this will do to everybody's tax bill. I hope this is what you progressive wanted.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
03:40 PM on 10/17/2010
I can read in fact. What I want to know is what exact part of this do you find objectionable? I assume it is the "excludable from employee's gross income". Which makes it tax exempt. Can you read? do you know what the words mean? I don't think this post demostrates that you can and that you do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
06:56 PM on 10/17/2010
Wonder how long it will take to put that in the taxable category?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
07:04 PM on 10/17/2010
The above statement doesn't necessarily mean that the amount is not taxable, what the provision appears to mean is that any amount that you don't pay should be put in a seperate box. Remember, both the employer and employee pay a part of healthcare costs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
10:48 PM on 10/03/2010
Mr. Fairey, let's go over the facts again. Up until Senator Brown was elected it didn't matter what the Republicans wanted since the Democrats could and did shove through whatever they wanted (i.e. Healthcare Reform). You can use that clique "the party of No all you wanted" but the American people are not buying your talking points and will show there displeasure come November. You can call them the party of "No" all you want but I would prefer to say that they were doing what the American people wanted while the Democrats don't seem to care what the American people want.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
07:59 PM on 10/17/2010
You're the one blindly using talking points. On many things you're just plain wrong. Support your case if you will. I don't believe you have the information to do that. Democrats do care what people want. That's why we're going to win this election, and at least partly by virtue of younger voters who aren't polled. Other than them--and they vote democratic, by and large--the polls that you see are very close. Including them: we win. Again, I think the facts are not in your favor. And I think you're projecting regarding talking points and an inabiity to see past the rhetoric.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amst
10:44 PM on 10/03/2010
I'm glad I read this story. I did see the headline showing your disappointment and wondered how you felt. I'm actually in agreement with you Shepard. I'm disappointed that things are not going quicker, but I understand these things take time. You can't believe the media rightwing bias. They are itching to bring the President down. I wish I knew Where the F... they were when Bush was totally screwing us over? Nowhere to be seen/heard
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Chris1962
NYC
10:36 PM on 10/03/2010
>>>I realize Obama was handed the worst economy and political climate facing a president in modern history and that it will take time for our country to recover and begin to move in the right direction.>>>

What crap. The recovery is dragging BECAUSE of Obama's ridiculous Keynesian plan.   gt;>>I also realize the Republican party and its leaders have no intention of being constructive partners in trying to solve the difficult problems facing our nation.>>>

Jeepers, you don't suppose they're saying "no" because their constituents want them to, do ya? Wake up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PwqSCJmbxk
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
marco01
10:44 PM on 10/03/2010
Yeah whatever. Even Bush and his cabal knew that the banks had to be bailed out to prevent another Great Depression. It doesn't take a genius to understand that had they failed they would have taken down the rest of the economy with them, just like in '29.

Two years have passed since we nearly fell off the brink. The economy is improving, jobs are being added to the economy. Recovery just doesn't happen overnight.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Chris1962
NYC
11:25 PM on 10/03/2010
>>>Even Bush and his cabal knew that the banks had to be bailed out to prevent another Great Depression. It doesn't take a genius to understand that had they failed they would have taken down the rest of the economy with them, just like in '29.>>>

Yeah, that's another thing we have to thank the Dems for: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warning/view/?utm_campaign=viewpage&utm_medium=grid&utm_source=grid
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
08:01 PM on 10/17/2010
Best line of the evening. "Yeah whatever" is right. These people aren't paying attention. their purpose isn't to enlighten or even talk factually. Much less to be able to tell the difference between fact and fiction. Let's start calling the "low information voter" what they really are: ignorant and apathetic.
photo
lightist
light as a photon, heavy as tungsten.
10:15 PM on 10/03/2010
Perfectly shallow views.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mea25
07:51 PM on 10/03/2010
I'm just sayin: Think long and hard before you decide to throw the baby out with the bathwater because the change that candidate and President Obama promised hasn't come fast enough. The alternative of replacing Dems with Repubs because you're feeling betrayed or disappointed is a worse nightmare than what we are living through now. It's not all up to Obama. It's up to democratic and republican senators and congress people, and most importantly it's up to us. Be the change you want to see.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Chris1962
NYC
10:38 PM on 10/03/2010
>>>I'm just sayin: Think long and hard before you decide to throw the baby out with the bathwater because the change that candidate and President Obama promised hasn't come fast enough.>>>

Change, huh? Little does the average liberal even know... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PwqSCJmbxk THAT'S what you can believe in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
03:43 PM on 10/17/2010
So this is disinformation day at HP, propaganda day. You can tell by the insults. You can't write even two sentences without making broad generalizations about--and insulting--liberals. What exactly do you expect to accompllish exept expose yourself as an irrational, emotional, unfit for thinking and analysis, kind of guy, Chris? Because you aren't doing anything to change my mind--instead you're solidifying many opinions that are opposite of yours. You have no message, just vitriol....which places your comment in the "strictly propaganda" category. Not even a good try. Better luck next time.
photo
studioh!
just.words.
07:37 PM on 10/03/2010
well thought and written, mr. fairey, and sums up the situation for many of us.

how's that "hopey-changey" thing working out for you now, she asks?
hope springs eternal, ms.keeps-on-running-at-the-mouth
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Chris1962
NYC
10:39 PM on 10/03/2010
LOL. If only liberals knew... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PwqSCJmbxk
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
03:46 PM on 10/17/2010
Chris--just stop. Nobody cares what you seem to think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:55 PM on 10/03/2010
"If Obama runs for reelection in 2012, I will support him"

Disappointed. Will you be re-doing the poster with "Same as Bush"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mea25
07:12 PM on 10/03/2010
I am an optimist. I am sometimes naive and ideological. Politics is a realm where compromise reigns. So, if you're not going to vote for Obama in 2012, who will it be? Sarah Palin? Mitt Romney or Huckabee? Or Nader? Or Jeb Bush? I am both hopeful and disappointed. I have to remain hopeful, or I could always move to Croatia or New Zealand. Nahhh. That's not my style.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:43 PM on 10/03/2010
I am as old as dirt, and left the States during Bushes 1st term, and have no plans to return, even after death. That said, I did buy into Obama's campaign and supported it, long before most.

Come 2012, just might not go to the trouble of getting a ballot and sending it in, except maybe in the primary. If I want the same old policies, it just does not matter who gets elected.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bridgeworker
06:52 PM on 10/03/2010
Thank you, Shepard. I appreciate your efforts at clarity against the black-and-white sales job the mainstream media often foists upon us. You have to wonder what the political landscape would look like if the media didn't feed the drama. And, I'm right there with you. I'm not disappointed in Obama but I am frustrated at how successful the obstructionists have been, even while in the minority. I don't doubt that Obama is as frustrated as we are. We need all Democrats to stop apologizing for liberal beliefs and take a stand, make your case. And we need to do the same in our communities - to not be silent and let the loudest voices be the ones most heard, those who would further dismantle our social safety nets and cause untold human suffering as a result. Obama can't be the only one out there fighting for change. That is a recipe for disaster. It needs to be all Democrats and reasonable Republicans, and all people of good will.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkagain2
07:11 PM on 10/03/2010
Well said. I agree.
06:34 PM on 10/03/2010
Thank you for your thoughtful and reasonable commentary about the President.
I would like to add another perspective about Presidency in general and American's largely unrealistic views on just what it is. It seems, particularly on the Left, that Americans think of the President as a sort of king, who rules by decree and has power over every aspect of public life. In particular, many on the Left seemed to have viewed Obama in 2008 as some kind of modern-day King Arthur, who would bring peace and harmony to all the lands through the power of his magic sword Excalibur (his voice? his smile?).
Well, there is no Excalibur. And the President is not king. He cannot legislate by decree. In fact, the President has far more power OUTSIDE the United States than he has inside it - as the founders intended! He is Commander-in-Chief - essentially the top general - of all the U.S. Armed Forces. That alone would be a full-time job for anyone. But in addition to that, he is the CEO of the Executive branch - chief diplomat and chief administrator. And the Left expects him to be Chief Legislative Officer, Chief Information Officer, and Chief Inspirational Officer as well!
Whatever happened to "Think what you can do for your country?" Instead of whining about what Obama has not achieved, look in the mirror. What have you achieved for Obama?
06:50 PM on 10/03/2010
Brilliant post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mea25
07:00 PM on 10/03/2010
Fanned and faved!!! Your post is thought provoking and insightful.
05:13 PM on 10/03/2010
When will progressives learn that President Obama is the most mean-sprited and mendacious president since Richard M. Nixon. Just look at his list of "accomplishments" :

1. Bring back nuclear power with liability underwritten by the taxpayers
2. Initiate off-shore drilling off the East Coast and in the Gulf of Mexico, a position taken just weeks before the BP blowout catastrophe
3, Tax middle class health policies (so-called "Cadillac" policies) with the goal of eliminating typical middle class health coverage plans
4. After Congress had refused to do so, Obama established the "Deficit Reduction" (aka catfood) Commission with the goal of damaging Social Security, while maintaining tax cuts for the wealthy
6. Keeping Guantanamo open for business
7. Escalating the war in Afghanistan
8. Planning and pushing through the health care plan using secret behind closed doors negotiations in which Liz Fowler authored the health plan for Sen Baucus. Liz Fowler is the epitome of the Washington "revolving door" in which those from government service move to the private sector, and then back to government. First working as an aide to Baucus on health matters, then working as VP at health insurance company Wellpoint, then returning to Baucus' staff to write the health bill, and now Obama appointed Fowler to a senior position in the US Health and Human Services Department to oversee the implementation of the her plan.
9. Finally, where are the jobs that were promised as priority #1 by the President during the canpaign
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueinannarbor
my mico-bio is now full
06:10 PM on 10/03/2010
Most mean-spirited since Richard Nixon? Wow, that's stretch. Why don't you just call him what the 'Baggers are calling him: a marxist, maoist, fascist, nazi, socialist, communist, terrorist-sympathizing racist. As a Obama supporter, I, myself, am disappointed by some of the positions he's taken, but I hardly feel like hyperventilating over it. Insofar as the recession is over the stimulus was successful. As is the case with any stimulus plan, be it FDR's New Deal or Reagan's New Federalism, the idea is to fill the "recessionary gap" so that the market takes over. As of yet, that hasn't happened, but keep in mind that employment is a lagging economic indicator. As far as the health care reform goes, that was probably the first important piece of legislation passed by our increasingly dysfuntional political system since the '60's. As Bismarck said, "If you like laws and sausage, you probably will not want to watch either one of them made."
photo
egal
Reality disagrees with Conservative assessments
07:11 PM on 10/03/2010
1. Faced with continuing to erode our economy and environment untenably, he chose energy production loathed by many but better-regulated and (sadly) vastly safer. We fear nuclear energy more because its damage potential and visibility is higher. But we also fear plane crashes for the same reasons, yet car crashes are immensely more frequent, dangerous, and deadly than plane crashes, while the same can be said of oil disasters being more harmful than contained nuclear production.
2. The GOP made this a huge cooperation/bipartisanship issue, used this as a political bomb, and DEMANDED far more of it supposedly to create jobs and boost economy.
3. UPPER-class policies, with the goal of eliminating the propensity for such a style of health coverage to leave only the wealthy with decent care.
4. You got this one backwards. Obama's trying to INCREASE Social Security benefits and available cash, and REDUCE the tax cuts for the wealthy.
5. You missed this number.
6. Closing Guantanamo would be ideal, but currently impossible. The opposition made the efforts too expensive, politically and economically, and the legal issues have been so far muddied this has become a Gordian Knot--there's no good way of closing the place because of muck-raked fears similar to those outlined in 1. above.
7. Safety first--militarily, this was the ONLY choice.
8. Your imagined-as-facts are quite warped, but mostly that's conspiracy theories.
9. Jobs were increased dramatically; the Republicans refused to let us keep them.
03:55 PM on 10/03/2010
It's not that change hasn't come fast enough; it's that Obama never believed in change. You need look no further than Afghanistan and Health Care to see that he is a weak, craven, unprincipled politician, ready to capitulate to the MIC and to the moneyed interests. If he had at least TRIED (and used the bully pulpit effectively to educate citizens and provide cover for nervous Dems), he could have made the history books for something other than being the first mixed race POTUS.

Mr President: Give back the f'ing Peace Prize!
04:07 PM on 10/03/2010
@khepri.... typical comment,but hope the other change you might get will give you all the peace you want!Yeah,right!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mea25
04:43 PM on 10/03/2010
You're faulting President Obama for not bringing profound change to a completely broken down system of government and economy in the blink of an eye? SHEESH!! Times are tough yes, but no one has that kind of power because the founders set uo our system of government in such a way that you have to be methodical and the only way to bring about change within our system of government is incrementally. It's not a monarchy or a wizardry. You need to go out and find yourself an attention span and some patience. Patience is a virtue.
06:00 PM on 10/03/2010
It's called squandering a huge mandate to do something new, and squandering majorities in both houses. What you are missing is the leadership piece. I could see that going away as soon as Obama bargained away the public option a year and a half ago, cut deals w big pharma, allowed drug reimportation to die, then sent his thug Rahm down to quash the medicare buy in idea. He beat up on Kucinich, but he didn't dare touch Lieberman. It's just about leadership; leadership of the party, cracking the whip. So my point remains: he didn't even try to ram it through. His proposals were back-peddling and riddled with new concessions every day.

As for Afghanistan--what's this about ramping up? How could Obama have done that? That's a leadership issue too, and it calls for guts and a willingness to be a one-term pres. to make a difference. As it is, he will only be remembered because his race is novel to the position.
03:14 PM on 10/03/2010
Great article. Thanks for clarifying and detailing your position and fighting back against the superficial and false narratives out there.