iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Shirin Sadeghi

Shirin Sadeghi

Posted: December 25, 2008 10:56 AM

Ahmadinejad's Alternative to the Queen's Christmas Message


If Christ were on Earth today he'd probably watch Iranian President Ahmadinejad's British Christmas day speech over the Queen's.

The fact is, the "sombre" message (as it is being officially endorsed) of a jewel encrusted and glorified dynastic ruler is a far cry from the values of humility and humanity that Jesus Christ represents for those of the Abrahamic faiths. Especially as the worst economic crisis of the last 100 years is bringing the world to its knees.

Ahmadinejad, on the other hand -- with his deliberately modest attire and his customized religious everyman image -- is quite a bit more in tune with a Christmas message.

That and the fact that Britain's Channel 4 enjoys stoking controversy have made this year's "alternative to the Queen's Christmas message" (as per a C4 tradition that started in 1993) quite a showstopper as far as boring speeches about peace and humanity by powerful leaders go.

It's hard not to be fascinated by the fact that a man living in the bubble of the Islamic Republic of Iran has proven to be the greatest media mind in contemporary global leadership. Not content with effortlessly reducing major American journalists (not so fast Diane Sawyer) to defensive interviewees, Ahmadinejad has perfected the au courant rule of celebrity media success: never leave the limelight (or the paparazzi flashes, as it may be.)

Like Paris Hilton before him, Ahmadinejad continually reminds the world that he exists and along the way picks up more and more attention. Any news is good news in the world of 24 hour global media and somehow the unshorn leader of an isolated Muslim country has outmastered his Western Armani-wearing counterparts in the game they invented.

But unlike Hilton (and the Queen, whose own speech is so deep it will be complemented with home video of her playing with a toddler Prince Charles), Ahmadinejad has substance. His speech is a clever combination of Christian beliefs and his own analysis of the direction of international politics. His detailed appreciation of the character and values attributed to Jesus Christ are a concerted effort to demonstrate what many an honest theologian will tell you: there is very little difference between the 3 Abrahamic religions and it's almost laughable that most believers of these faiths don't seem to realize it.

To top it off, Ahmadinejad - always quick on the uptake - has borrowed a phrase from today's messiah Barack Obama: change. "Today, the general will of nations is calling for fundamental change. This is now taking place. Demands for change, demands for transformation, demands for a return to human values are fast becoming the foremost demands of the nations of the world." Indeed Ahmadinejad's speech is not merely a media coup but a smart melding of religious language, Abrahamic values, and exactly the kind of anti-war, pro-humanity talk that is dominating the sensibilities of an entire world that is exhausted by the corporate wars that are currently being fought in the name of peace.

Ultimately, if you get past the religio-talk, Ahmadinejad's uniting message of peace and human rights may be the only world leader speech you can agree with this Christmas. Here's to hoping he'll take his own advice.

If Christ were on Earth today he'd probably watch Iranian President Ahmadinejad's British Christmas day speech over the Queen's. The fact is, the "sombre" message (as it is being officially endorsed...
If Christ were on Earth today he'd probably watch Iranian President Ahmadinejad's British Christmas day speech over the Queen's. The fact is, the "sombre" message (as it is being officially endorsed...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:32 PM on 12/27/2008
Forr thousands of years Jews have lived in peace in Arab lands. A thousand years ago when Christians were killing Jews and confining them to ghettos, Jews were living in peace as "People of he Book" in Arab lands. When the Crusaders attacked Jerusalem, Jews fought side by side with Muslims to defend the city. When the Crusaders captured the city they massacred Jews and Muslims alike. When the Moors controlled Spain and Portugal, Jews and Christians lived there in peace and religous freedom. When the Christians reconquered Spain Muslims and Jews were persecuted. Jews were given the choice to convert to Christianity or perish at the stake. When Golda Maier told King Abdullah that the Jews within his kingdom planned to declare independence, he asked why did her people feel this need for their own state when they had lived in peace under the protection of Muslim rulers for so many years.
Finally Hamas published a manifesto on the British newspaper Guardian that said we have no quarrel with Jews. We have a quarrel with a bunch of people who have stolen our land who happen to be Jews. This is a political quarrel.
Much as I support Israel's need to exist, it's hard to find fault with Ahmadinejad's argument that goes this way. The holocaust you describe took place in Europe. The murders were perpetrated and condoned by Europeans. Why should Palestinians who have always treated Jews humanely pay the price. Why isn't Germany paying the price?!
10:12 PM on 12/27/2008
With all respect, I think your interpretation of history is quite inaccurate i.e. everyone lived in peace without Christians/European... and your defense of Hamas is slightly odd because it is based on propaganda statements to western media for the purpose of swaying western public opinion and exploiting sympathy for the conditions of Palestinians in Gaza. The fact is Hamas is classified a terrorist organization by the State Department, the EU, Canada, and others. While Hamas claims to have no quarrel with Jews, its charter is full of standard anti-Semitism. The charter contains conspiracy theories, widely references the elders of the protocol of Zion (the classical anti-Semitic forgery), and recites anti-Jewish prose. While in their Guardian piece Hamas appears sincere and humanist, in there party-controlled media in Gaza they incite plenty of hate towards Jews. Hamas' Al-Aqsa TV became infamous for its children programs that indoctrinate hate, complete with a Mickey Mouse-like character and bunnies. Your point about Palestinians paying the price for European actions may be valid, but it is irrelevant in 2008. The state of Israel exists, and thus we must find a viable solution that both sides can agree upon. But don't buy into the notion that this is simply a "political quarrel"; if that were the case, then I feel this tragic conflict would have been solved a long time ago.
09:42 PM on 12/28/2008
I am not trying to interpret history. I am simply recounting facts that can be confirmed from historical records. In fact after the Catholic Christians took over in Spain many Jews converted to Christianity to avoid being burnt at the stake. Sometime later the Inquisition began to mistrust these conversions and for the first time their Jewishness was treated as an ethnicity rather than religous heresy and they were driven out of Spain. Many took refuge in Muslim lands. These are hard facts.

Unfortunately the state of war between Israel and the Palestinians results in each side demonizing the other. For the Palestinians, the state of Israel will come to define all Jews.
photo
Kache
Citizens, Unite!
01:14 PM on 12/27/2008
Excellent article Ms. Sadeghi!

You quote the speech "demands for a return to human values are fast becoming the foremost demands of the nations of the world." Indeed this has been a constant theme of Ahmadinejad's in speeches over the years. The Iranian revolution was, itself, a rejection of "modernist" Western values more than anything else.

The rise of fundamentalism, whether it be Islamic, Christian, Judaic, or Hindu, is just as much a rejection of "modernist" Western values as it is an embrace of theology. While there is a global middle class extending across borders into most countries that do embrace "modernist" Western values, they are the ones who have benefited. Others in societies have experienced "modernist" Western values through exploitation and/or culture/future shock and react with rejection. If you read Ahmadinejad's speeches, whether given in the Moslem world or South America, one word keeps popping up - humiliation.

Hopefully the current financial meltdown (and the end of "bling" as a lifestyle) may cause "modernists" to dig deep into their nest to rediscover the humanity of Western values.

Thank you, Shirin Sadeghi. Your articles are always as insightful and thought provoking as they are courageous.
10:40 PM on 12/27/2008
Ms. Sadeghi's articles may be intelligent, insightful, and provoking, but i don't know how you could objectively conclude that they are similarily "courageous". what is she risking by posting these views on a website patronized mainly by individuals sympathetic to her views? Now, if she were to regularly post articles highly critical of the Mullahs and Ahmadinejad in Tehran with her full name attached, then I would think she were a bit more courageous. but your point is taken.. i do find Ms. Sadeghi's articles thought-provoking and entertaining.
03:56 AM on 12/27/2008
Maybe he should be invited to lead a prayer at the inauguration.
11:27 PM on 12/26/2008
If Christ were here today, he would be preaching to the entire Muslim world, the meaning of love, value for human life, and respect and equality for their women.
Bootoomee
Driven by rationality & common sense not ideology
10:01 AM on 12/27/2008
While cheering America on to keep invading other nations and killing their peoples.
03:35 PM on 12/27/2008
He'd be preaching to the entire world, not just the muslims. Remember Mergina, don't point out the speck in another peoples eye without noticing the log in the United States. We are far from perfect and I'm sure that JC would be quite disapointed with the state of the world, not just Muslims.
11:19 PM on 12/26/2008
I completely disagree with your thesis. Ahmadinejad is more of a buffoon then a clever, media savvy person that you say he is. His "speech" at Columbia university is a case in point. When asked about execution of Homosexuals in Iran he said, "In Iran we don't have homosexuals like in your country," he said, to laughter and boos from the audience. 'In Iran we do not have this phenomenon. I don't know who's told you that we have this."

You may criticize the Queen, but the last time I checked England doesn't execute people because of their sexual preference. Not being content to just execute homosexuals, Iran leads the world in child executions. So much for Ahmadinejad's "compassion."
Bootoomee
Driven by rationality & common sense not ideology
10:03 AM on 12/27/2008
Britain only follow America to invade other nations and murder their citizens.
01:38 PM on 12/26/2008
Great article, well written and courageous.
01:20 PM on 12/26/2008
I know the Queen of England was related to the Iranian President's speech because it was broadcast in England, but really, to somehow tie a symbolic relic of history to England's financial crises, while all the time ignoring the TRUE dictators and kings in the middle east and their exemplary record on human rights, is laughable.
12:29 PM on 12/27/2008
I'm sure all the dissidents rotting in Iranian prisons, the women who are beaten and raped by the religious goon squads, and the gay people brutally executed all thank her today,
12:43 PM on 12/26/2008
Ya but he left out the other kafirs - the non-abrahamic religions, Hinduism, Budhism and Chinese thinking like Confuciasism and Taoism. Who cares about the Queen and the Abrahamic religions because those that matter like Christianity is moving towards secularism and the peoples of the non-abrahamic religions, i.e., Asians seems to be controlling world affairs more and more with the erstwhile-Christian secularists. The followers of Abrahamic religions Christians, Jews and Muslims seem destined to the fate of the Queen - i.e., irrelevance.
01:06 PM on 12/26/2008
NoFuzz, he didn't refer to anyone in his speech as "kafirs", rather, he couldn't anyway. Once we all stop drinking that Fox News Koolaid, we can realize how much crap we have been fed about the world. FYI, the kafir label is probably used more by Neocons than it is by Muslims.

It's the Holiday Time, maybe a little warmness and being openminded wouldn't kill. Beyond that, I found his speech to be fine. The media is just bored.
01:22 PM on 12/26/2008
This was a "Merry Christmas" message, did' you get it? Do Hindus, Taoists, Bhudists celebrate Christmas? obviiously you just had to criticize him and could not find anything to say. Desparate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
willpen
Annoy a Conservative. Use facts and logic.
12:09 PM on 12/26/2008
If nothing else, Ms Sadeghi has stood up to make a bold statement. Right or wrong maybe we all need to reassess the way we all perceive religion and what it brings to the table.

We have officially been in the 21st century for some time now but I don't really think that we have collectively taken that step over the threshold in order to expand on how religious concepts and values control our every day dialogue and actions. Maybe.... just maybe we should all stop and listen...
03:08 PM on 12/26/2008
it is good to listen, but it is also important to think analytically and objectively... consider the message, the messenger, and the purpose of the message.
photo
piul05
Are you looking at my ears?! (Mo-om!!!)
10:52 AM on 12/26/2008
Well said. I completely agree with your assessment of the man and of his speech.
08:29 AM on 12/26/2008
"Ultimately, if you get past the religio-talk..."

Sorry. Can't do it.

From the speech: "All Prophets called for the worship of God..."

And: "...All the problems that have bedevilled humanity throughout the ages came about because humanity followed an evil path and disregarded the message of the Prophets..."

And, finally "We believe, Jesus Christ will return, together with one of the children of the revered Messenger of Islam and will lead the world to love, brotherhood and justice...."

This IS a religious speech delivered for a Religious occasion. Sugar coat it all you want, but his words do not give me hope towards changing from a planet consumed by humans killing each other over their belief systems.

Just more propaganda to keep the masses confused.
03:06 PM on 12/26/2008
but effective propaganda, if Ms. Sadeghi's comments are any indicator... it is also propaganda with a purpose: to weaken western domestic support for any hardline policy towards iran.
08:07 AM on 12/26/2008
I rather doubt it.

If the Christ were on earth today, He'd be locked up in a maximum security prison somewhere as a dangerous radical.

And given He's from the Middle East and has a beard, probably subject to all sorts of horribly unimaginable interrogation techniques.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SadButWiser
06:56 PM on 12/26/2008
Not sure whether to smile or to feel sad after reading your comment.
06:33 AM on 12/26/2008
I did not watch the speech so I cannot comment on it. But I am not sure that Jesus would appreciate that people get stoned to death in Iran for converting to Christianity or for homosexuality.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SadButWiser
07:11 PM on 12/26/2008
Have you read the bible. People get stoned for many things in it.
01:14 PM on 12/27/2008
Yes, it's in the Bible, but in today's world it's only Islamic states actually doing it.
This is why we have to fight secular nation-hating Christian fundamentalists as if the very survival of America the Free depended on it.
03:52 AM on 12/26/2008
This maybe one of the strangest posts I’ve ever read on this website. Ms. Sadeghi seems to go out of her way to praise Ahmadinejad's Christmas message, while simultaneously criticizing the Queen for offering words without substance and being symbolically ostentatious. Ms. Sadeghi seems impressed by Ahamdinejad's media outreach, even if its been the de rigueur Iranian strategy for sometime now: portray Ahamdinejad as a misunderstood humanist to weaken western domestic opposition and convince individuals like Ms. Sadeghi to criticize American policies towards Iran, all while concurrently implementing a hostile policy (arming Iraqi Shiite extremists to kill American servicemen, continuing a nuclear weapons program, etc).This was a similar strategy Yasser Arafat employed during his later years as leader of the PLO; he talked like a man of peace to a western audience (more effective in English), but then advocated continued violent resistance to a Palestinian audience. The message's argument is also quite fallacious with the attempted politicization of Christ e.g. "opposing warmongers", fighting "against tyrannical policies". Jesus never condemned any nation, even Rome, for its policies e.g. slavery, political oppression, and imperialist wars. Jesus teachings were primarily concerned with individual sin. From an amoral perspective, Ahamdinejad’s message is not very substantive or original; it's the same garden variety language he uses at any international forum. If his objective is to start a groundswell of positive opinion vis-à-vis Iran’s sincere-broker image, I doubt this message will convince anyone save the edges of the Western leftwing.
07:00 AM on 12/26/2008
Ali.
Oh dear, as to your presentation on Jesus, it seems that he was as bad as Bush. He did not oppose any evil in his society such as slavery, warmongering, imperialism.... What a prophet (or whatever) to follow!
As to Ahmadijejad, Ms. Sadeghi makes absolutely corrcet assessment. He is a man of peace and human values based on the teachings of his religion. Iran supports justice and helps curb injustice, the most outstanding example of which is Israeli atrocities and crimes against the Palestinians. Why would that bother you?
As to the Queeen, who cares? She is a super rich nobody when it comes to world affairs.
10:54 AM on 12/26/2008
Ahmadinejad is a man of peace...now I've heard it all. First of all, this entire post by Sadeghi proves that some people can be willingly "played" by a religious zealot who knows how to get media coverage. And obviously iblisexpat has a problem with Israel...let us not forget it is Ahmadinejad who preaches nothing but hatred for Israel and all Jews with his theories of Holocaust revisionism. Iran oppresses it's own people and threatens the entire world with it's brand of religious totalitarianism, but if you think they're so just, then perhaps you should move there...
02:43 PM on 12/26/2008
I never argued that Jesus “was bad,” compared him to president bush, etc... my point was that Jesus was not a political actor i.e. he did not roundly criticize Rome or its policies (ala ahamdienjad's conjectures)... Jesus talked about the individual. So when ahamdienjad argues that if Jesus were alive today he would condemn “imperialism and occupiers” i.e. certain governments that would almost certainly be false. to argue that ahmadienjad is a "man of peace" requires a leap of faith that runs in opposition to much evidence. His rehtoric changes depending on the audience... he calls for justice for palestinians to western media, but to an Iranian revolutionary/hard-line audience he calls for the destruction of Israel. whatever your opinion of the US/western policies, to believe that ahamdienjad, a strong domestic anti-liberal who is both homophobic and anti-Semitic, is a messenger of human values plays right into the Iranian media strategy that I mentioned in my previous comment.
03:25 PM on 12/25/2008
As an American, non Muslim living in the UK I found Ahmadinejad's speech on Channel 4 tonight to be thoughtful and unoffensive. I do hope, as the author did, that he follows his own advice. And I hope for 2009 that our two cultures try harder to understand one another.
02:36 PM on 12/26/2008
"As an American, non Muslim living in the UK I found Ahmadinejad's speech on Channel 4 tonight to be thoughtful and unoffensive."

of course you did...that's how propaganda is done