iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Shon Hopwood

GET UPDATES FROM Shon Hopwood
 

Giving Prisoners a Second Chance Means Removing the Barriers to Reentry

Posted: 08/20/2012 4:38 pm

"It says here that you are deceased," the bank manager said. After I assured him that I was very much alive, he typed a few more search terms. He then placed one finger into the air and brought it down on the return key.

"Nope, it still says you are dead," he said.

A federal prison had just released me into a federal halfway house, and I was trying to open a bank account for the first time in over a decade.

The halfway house had told me that I could not start working until I had a bank account, and now the bank was telling me that all three credit bureaus listed me as deceased.

When I went back to the halfway house and asked for help, the staff told me to hire an attorney to contact the credit bureaus.

What wonderful advice! All I needed to do was to hire an attorney to contact the credit bureaus, so I could obtain a bank account to start a job, so I could make some money because I had none.

Yes, I was living one of those DirectTV "don't wake up in a roadside ditch" commercials.

And my reentry experience was not an anomaly.

Every year state and federal prisons release more than 650,000 people, a population equal to that of Seattle or Boston. Rather than providing the means for a successful transition, many states and the federal government hurl prisoners out into the world with little or no support.

It is therefore no wonder that these policies threaten public safety and the public fisc because over two-thirds of released prisoners will reoffend and land back in jail or prison, at the hefty cost of approximately $30,000 a year.

It wasn't supposed to be this way. During his State of the Union address in 2004, President George W. Bush said, "America is the land of the second chance and when the gates of the prison open, the path ahead should lead to a better life." President Bush went on to sign the Second Chance Act providing funding for prisoner reentry programs. But Congress has since reduced and cut portions of a program that could save state and federal governments millions in the costs of corrections.

In addition, many current state and federal laws interfere with the rights of full citizenship, regulating former prisoners to second-class citizenship. For example, the Sentencing Project recently reported that approximately "1 of every 40 adults is disenfranchised" and cannot vote due to a current or previous felony conviction. These felon disenfranchisement laws have a disproportionate impact on African American communities where nearly "1 of every 13 African Americans of voting age is disenfranchised, a rate more than four times greater than non-African Americans."

These policies undermine our nation's commitment to providing people with a fresh start to rebuild their lives and become productive members of society.

"I think, believe in the idea of redemption, that people can get a second chance, that people can change," President Barack Obama once said.

Believing is one thing, but until we remove some of the barriers to prisoner reentry, our country's commitment to second chances will never be a reality.

 

Follow Shon Hopwood on Twitter: www.twitter.com/shonhopwood

FOLLOW CRIME
"It says here that you are deceased," the bank manager said. After I assured him that I was very much alive, he typed a few more search terms. He then placed one finger into the air and brought it dow...
"It says here that you are deceased," the bank manager said. After I assured him that I was very much alive, he typed a few more search terms. He then placed one finger into the air and brought it dow...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:50 PM on 08/26/2012
It's amazing to me that so few people either read and/or commented. I think that there are HUGE issues with the disenfranchised especially for those who have committed a non-violent felony and served their time. There should be a ten year maximum on the felony charge nationally, and once that peson has served their parole and the ten years with no other crime, their records should be cleared permanently. I know it seems like a long time, but if someone has moved on with their life and isn't a danger nor has he/she recommitted, remove the felony and see how few break the law again. Most of the people who re-offend after a frsit felony do so before their parole is even finished. So those who stay clear of trouble should be acknowledged for maybe having made a mistake but they proved themselves to be rehabilitated. I don't think, especially in today's world, people understand how hard it is to overcome something like that and prove yourself to be a productive part of a society. Thank you for writing about this Shon Hopwood.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nypapajoe
12:23 AM on 08/26/2012
Everyone deserves a second chance! But violent criminal felons deserve nothing and murders even less! Sociopathic individuals can not be treated just like a pedophile! they must be incarcerated for life and those convicted of murder must be executed! There are no sunctuaries in America because of career criminals! Prisons today are universities for criminality not rehabilitation! These mental defectives can not live amongst civility!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Simon Bau Jensen
04:29 AM on 08/23/2012
I have yet to understand the idea of removing suffrage simply based on your status as incarcerated. The American philosophy behind incarceration is to take away almost all citizens rights from the prisoner. It is also one philosophy that is simply wrong. The idea of taking away all rights only helps the inmate feel more removed from society and decreases the chance of him ever becoming a functioning, law-abiding citizen again. The idea that you cannot participate in shaping the society simply because you might have broken a small rule (yes murderers exists too) does not help in rehabilitating the convicted. In Denmark (my home), when you go to jail, you only lose your right to free movement (moving around in society), i.e. you can still vote. Although not the only difference from American legal system (our penalties are MUCH more tolerant), I do believe that this is part of the reason why we have much less crime. It helps to shape another idea about not adding to the idea of the convicted that he is totally removed from society. Rehabilitation, not longer incarcerations are definitely the way to go.
www.simonbau.blog.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OCerInTN
Hoplophobics worst nightmare.
04:33 AM on 08/24/2012
Prison is not for rehabilitation, it is for punishment.
12:29 PM on 08/25/2012
OCerin: You can incarerate for punishment and rehabilitate for the long term solution at the same time.
12:14 PM on 08/25/2012
Simon: Your post is so true. Once an inmate has served out their sentence, they are released and as such, should has all societal right available to them. I do however believe that when commits a crime, there are consequences, and those consequences need to be adhered to. Rehabilitation can begin at the start of the prison term, during and upon release. More needs to be done to ensure the person has a chance, instead of no chance to become a productive member of society, as is what is happening now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Simon Bau Jensen
12:14 PM on 08/26/2012
I totally agree that a criminal must face consequences when committing a crime. I just also think that society has an obligation to steer a criminal away from being a repeat offender, and not just by doubling punishment. Harsher punishments does not equal lower crime rates. I know that we are a much more equal society and that this contributes alot, but in Denmark the maximum penalty is life imprisonment, which is a 16 year sentence - out in 12. That might shock a lot of Americans, but this does not in any way mean that we have bodies pilling up in the streets. It's just a way of showing that harsher punishment does not mean lower crime rates.
www.simonbau.blog.com
04:18 PM on 08/22/2012
Maybe if his mom had done a better job he wouldnt have gone to jail in the first place.
12:31 PM on 08/25/2012
It isn't alway's the parents fault. Some have/are great parents, and still have children who get into trouble.
08:20 AM on 08/21/2012
So I know this all too well. My husband got in trouble when he was 18 years old. He got a facilitation to robbery charge. Meaning he wasn't the one doing it but he was there. My husband is now 30 years old and has not been in trouble since. He still cannot get a decent job because of his past. Something that happened 12 years ago. We have a 4 year old son who has to struggle because we are. It is sad. He is a hard working able body that wants to work and wants to work hard, but no one will give him a chance. My father has taught him the trade of plumbing. He is amazing at what he does, but no one will give him the opportunity to show is skills. Why? Because he got in trouble 12 years ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lady Gato
Knee deep in Hippie
01:33 AM on 08/22/2012
So sorry- it's really hard going through all that, especially with a child. My neighbor is a nice kid who went to prison for something he didn't do. He says he felt like he deserved it because he had done some things that he hadn't been arrested for. Then he served his time, came home to his parents place, but couldn't get a job. Not even working for the city picking up trash. After almost a year, he was finally hired to work on an oilfield drilling crew (we're in Texas). He was like a kid on Christmas morning when he got that job! If not for family, my friend would have ended up back in prison because he'd have had no home, no food, nothing. I hope someone will give your husband that hand up- soon. Good plumbers are hard to find!
09:07 AM on 08/25/2012
Thank you so much. It's nice to know that someone understands what we go through everyday. He still looks everyday and looks hard. He won't give up. :)
12:37 PM on 08/25/2012
amanda: I am not sure what trouble your husband had gotten into, but he should try and see if he can have his record sealed. Most states will do this if the charge(s) were not thing's like manslaugter, rape, domestic, DUI, etc. Once a record is sealed, he can apply for job's and answer no to the questions on the employment for which ask if he has ever been convicted. He can get the information on how to at your local court house.
08:11 AM on 08/31/2012
I appreciate the advise but it was a Class C felony and you cannot seal your record if you charge is C or above.
photo
wonderinbear
my micro bio is empty
12:06 AM on 08/21/2012
The Second Chance Act is a second chance for all concerned, it is fiscally prodent and socially sound. The problem is in its application and the maze of Sate laws that create failure where success should be. If one cannot find work, housing, education then what is left? Recidivism grows from such issues created by poorly concived policies and laws lower community safety. If a returning prisoner is allowed to work and grow the chances of a second crime drop to less than 3 percent if he is not allwed the there is a 73% chance of a new crime. In the end which makes you safer?
07:58 PM on 08/20/2012
I enjoyed reading your blog. My son is presently incarcerated and I know the day he comes home the family will have to make a way for him. That is why before they leave the facility they have to have some where to go and they need to find work. But if the thousands of people who are not incarcerated can;t find worked what makes them think that inmates just coming backed out in the world can find work? This is messed up. They're hoping that they messed up as an excuse to put them back in. And let's not forfet about the Privitization of prisons. The law as we know sets up these repeat offenders,just to put them back in. This is the new form of slavery and for every prisoner they send to one of those private prisons,the judge,the prosecutor all get paid to send that prisoner to a private prison.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Simon Bau Jensen
04:40 AM on 08/23/2012
I can understand that it would certainly seem unfair to an unemployed man with 30 years of experience who badly needs a job to support his family, that a 24 year old gangbanger with 7 years in jail gets a job before he does. However, the present job situation will not continue, the job market will get better, thereby this system will not seem at all that unfair anymore. Additionally, if the ex-convict goes for a year after re-entering society, he will without a doubt commit new crimes. It is so essential to prevent ex-cons from re-entering their old habits. It is the obligation of society as a whole to do what it can to rehabilitate these people - it is far less expensive than simply putting him to jail for another 10 years - and it's also better for him and society that he gets a job and contributes.
www.simonbau.blog.com
12:42 PM on 08/25/2012
Sherbert: It keeps the correctional stocks up. Someone really should do an article on that, because most people don't know that corrections has it's own stocks.
04:55 PM on 08/28/2012
I've wondered about that,where would a person looked for those type of stock. L'm interested for research and conversational purposes only. I want to see how rich some of the scavengers get per body. Thank you