More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Silvia Henriquez

Silvia Henriquez

Posted: August 10, 2010 02:20 PM

After Jersey Garcia welcomed her first baby earlier this year in a planned pregnancy, she was shocked to learn that, despite having health insurance through her employer, she couldn't afford to resume her birth control. The IUD had been her reliable form of birth control for years, but she was told she must pay $800 in fees beyond what her health insurance covers. Switching to the birth control pill was also not affordable; the pill will cost her up to $480 per year in insurance co-payments. Both options are out of reach as she takes on the cost of a newborn. Jersey is reluctantly weighing one final option to access a reliable form of birth control: reveal private information on this deeply personal subject to a co-worker who is charged with submitting appeals to the insurance company.

As it stands, health care reform does nothing to minimize or eliminate these costly co-payments for birth control for working women. Women spend on average 30 years over their lifetime trying not to get pregnant. For women like Jersey, that could mean more than $15,000 in co-pays and related fees.

Despite health care reform, many Latinas are still without access to birth control even when they have health insurance. The country is mired in stigmatizing, sensationalized debates about Latinas and reproduction (Latina teens have twice the birth rate of white teens! Latinas are having babies so they can become citizens!). Yet scant attention is paid to the financial, regulatory and social barriers that stop many Latinas from accessing the birth control they seek.

Why is there more focus on stigmatizing Latinas and pregnancy than empowering Latinas to manage their fertility?

Just recently the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced new regulations for implementing health care reform and the Women's Health Amendment beginning in September. I was thrilled to see the new regulations will allow an estimated 31 million people with new insurance plans to access services that ensure a healthy pregnancy - including iron, hepatitis B screenings, well-baby and well-child visits.

Noticeably absent from the White House announcement was a determination as to whether the health care overhaul will offer birth control without co-payments and deductibles, a move that now could be years away. Also missing was recognition of the women most impacted by White House decision-making -- the voices of Latinas, immigrants and low-income women.

The National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health recently conducted focus groups among Latinas of Mexican origin in the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas. These women told us how they feel devalued by the fact that they qualify for health services when they are pregnant, but are largely ignored otherwise. As one woman put it when asked what she would need to maintain her health, she would need "to be able to get health care without being pregnant." Public health programs like Medicaid and Title X family planning services ban women without proof of legal residency status, and even make immigrants who can prove legal status wait five years for health care services like birth control.

The fact is: contraception is a critical component of both public health initiatives and women's health care.

Out of frustration that the Latina experience is stigmatized while the Latina voice is silenced, this week a coalition of Latina-focused organizations is sponsoring the Latina Week of Action for Reproductive Justice. Women like Jersey will be speaking out and inspiring others to action with their stories.

When health care reform passed, we were told that all men and women deserved access to affordable insurance coverage and preventative care. For millions of women, birth control, by definition, is prevention.

It's time for the White House to listen to these voices and deliver on that promise for women and their families.


 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtairtime
It is what it is
03:42 PM on 08/11/2010
Why is it the womans responsibility?

A vasectomy is easy, cheap and quick. I know hispanic men don't have a high rate of getting vasectomies, due to their cultural male dominated ideals which they carry here, but the women hold the key - no vasectomy no sex. Simple choice for most of us.
02:27 PM on 08/11/2010
What?? Condoms are cheaper...but one of the great thing about marraige/monogamy is No More Condoms. After we had our second child, we needed a long-term, dependable birth control method. After some research we decided to go for the IUD. I have a great job, good insurance and the IUD cost me $480 our of pocket! i asked them to look and see if an abortion would have been covered on my plan. Yup. $25 copay. So...making safe, effective, long-term low maintenance birth control accessible for all is a no-brainer.

The majority of women who seek abortion are already moms. many of them/us would choose an effective and safe birth control method like the IUD if it were more affordable.

We were able to put the thing on the credit card and pay it off over a few months. Not everyone has that luxury.
05:43 PM on 08/10/2010
Right "THAT" is the reason that they, illegals, are having so many babies because birth control is too expensive.

Where do they get this BS!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laserbeam
Nothing is permanent except change...
02:19 PM on 08/11/2010
Wow. Where's YOUR documentation and research? Can't wait to read the citations that support your statement.
03:06 PM on 08/11/2010
Seriously you do not believe that jus soli has anything to do with illegals having babies? Do you have windows in your home or a television, computer?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chivas
Illegitimi non carborondum
02:53 PM on 08/10/2010
Condoms are cheaper
05:44 PM on 08/10/2010
Thank you! Fanned!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laserbeam
Nothing is permanent except change...
02:53 PM on 08/11/2010
Condoms aren't nearly as effective, even when used properly. However, I strongly support them in conjunction with other forms of birth control to prevent STDs.
02:46 PM on 08/10/2010
Why is birth control not covered by insurance while Viagra is? Whenever I point out this contradiction to people, they are shocked to hear it. It is shocking - and indefensible. What is the argument that is offered on the part of health insurance companies? I've never learned it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtairtime
It is what it is
03:50 PM on 08/11/2010
Why is it you can get anything related to sexual functions at all when items like hearing aids are not allowed under just about any plan in the nation? Sex is a choice and with that choice the person should take personal responsibility - that means buying your own birth control or going to planned parenthood and getting FREE condoms.

The cost of childbirth far outweighs the cost of birth control from a business standpoint so I have trouble believing what you say is correct. There might be some plans that exclude it but I would bet most cover it.

But I will admit, if what you claim is true, it is real hypocrisy that men can get viagra while women can't get birth control.