iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sloan Barnett

GET UPDATES FROM Sloan Barnett

A Landmark Day in the Life of a Toxic Chemical: Interview With Ken Cook of the EWG

Posted: 10/06/11 05:56 PM ET

You've heard about BPA in the news for years, and recently you have even seen product labels that declare, "BPA Free!" But somehow BPA is still a dangerous presence in our world and is found in more than 90 percent of all Americans. It has been publicly linked to a host of health problems including early puberty, cancer, infertility, obesity and hyperactivity. New research has found evidence that BPA can interfere with the effectiveness of breast cancer medications. And still the federal government has not taken any action regulating this hormone-disrupter.

The good news is that several states have taken the lead and banned BPA. California has just followed suit this week with legislation requiring the elimination of BPA in baby bottles and sippy cups made or sold after July 1, 2013.

I had the privilege of speaking with one of my very own heroes this morning about the ban. Ken Cook, president and co-founder of Environmental Working Group, has lead the fight to protect our children from untested, undisclosed chemicals for the last two decades. I asked him about the importance and potential impact of this week's news and here is what he had to say:

"The chemical industry spent millions of dollars trying to kill the BPA legislation that Gov. Brown signed into law, and that's one very important way to measure the law's significance -- quite apart from the fact that because it is the nation's largest and most influential marketplace, what happens in California definitely does not stay in California. The California law will eliminate BPA from baby bottles and sippy cups across the nation.

Chemical companies are increasingly sensitive to the fact that the safety of their products is being questioned literally daily by an unprecedented flood of new research from independent scientists and government agencies. And as more consumers have tuned in to this emerging evidence, in many cases because of worrisome links between toxic industrial chemicals and health problems ranging from asthma to ADHD to cancer, the new science is having a huge impact in the marketplace.

I was shopping for kitchen gizmos the other day and I was stunned by the number of products labeled "BPA-free" or "No BPA." Anyone who has strolled through a baby store recently will notice the same thing.

The marketplace is racing ahead of legislators and regulators to identify -- and eliminate -- chemicals that have been linked to toxic health effects. The new California law will accelerate the elimination of BPA from baby bottles and sippy cups for everyone in California and far beyond, not just those of us who are fortunate to be informed about, and in a position to afford, the BPA-free products that have proliferated in recent years.

Chemical companies are deeply worried about these market developments, and they spring into defensive action whenever legislation comes along that reinforces and politicizes these consumer concerns. It took five years for EWG and other groups to win this battle -- which is nothing more, and nothing less, than keeping pace with what the public is demanding: an end to toxic chemicals in consumer products that end up in our bodies before we know if they are safe."

So what can you do until the federal government takes action? You can get a good start by using recycling codes as a general guideline. Use only polyethylene or polypropylene (numbers 1, 2, 4, or 5 inside chasing arrows will be marked on the bottom of most products). Ultimately, my choice for food storage and bottles is glass. It's easily recycled. And here's the thing: Glass is really tough -- far less of a concern about breaking than you would think. And certainly easier than worrying about the numbers on the plastic.

Your next step should be to choose fresh, unpackaged food. The Breast Cancer Fund reported a 60 percent decrease in BPA levels when fresh food was eaten for only three short days. And of course, we already know that real food is best all the time.

And last but not least, keep insisting on BPA-free products from manufacturers. Your buying choices speak volumes!

Follow Sloan Barnett on Twitter and join Sloan on her Facebook Fan Page.

 
 
 

Follow Sloan Barnett on Twitter: www.twitter.com/sloanbarnett

 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:43 PM on 10/07/2011
I have always found it fundamentally insane on every level that a chemical original designed and successfully tested as a very potent synthetic estrogenic compound, which the manufacturer's had hoped to use as an estrogen replacement in possibly hormone therapy, birth control medicine, and possible other uses, was then, without any additional toxicological testing, taken out of the realm of pharmacology and instead put into extreme widespread use as a plastisizer in products ranging from IV drip bags, syringes, baby bottles, soda bottles, and baby toys without any regard for it's extremely potent estrogen mimicking properties. How could the manufacturers not have thought that pumping so much of a potent drug into the chemical milieu would not upset the very sensitive endocrine balance of all animals. Is it any wonder that girls are developing breasts and menstruating many years earlier than before. Nobody should be surprised when towns that produce massive amounts of BPA have a ratio of girls to boys being born of five to one. How come everybody is not extremely alarmed by these things. I would not be surprised if all sorts of endocrine disorders are on a upswing. I have nothing against the female side of the sexual equation, I love women dearly, I think female characteristics have an important role to play in lives of everybody, but does it make sense to drown out the androgenic component of our species with female hormones in people of both sexes a wise, or even safe proposition.
11:36 AM on 10/07/2011
Thank you for this blog and thank you EWG. This group is really in a league of their own and is simply the best source of information if you care about protecting your health, your kid's health, clean air, water or food. Their reports and data bases are just amazing. I saw Ken Cook's 10 Americans talk at Duke last year and everyone there was just blown away. 10 Americans has been compared to "An Inconvenient Truth" and is the best - and most entertaining - presentation on why we all should care about the toxic chemicals in our environment. Check it out yourself...Ken's observations about the ED drug Cialis are priceless! It is well worth the 15 minutes.
http://www.ewg.org/kid-safe-chemicals-act-blog/kid-safe-chemicals-act-10-americans-video/

If you aren't among EWG's 1 million supporters you really are missing out on a lot of terrific information.