1dogs2's Comments (3998)
Why Obama Doesn't Write Families Of Soldiers Who Commit Suicide
Commented Nov 25, 2009 at 07:24:34 in Politics
“I'm as partisan as the next person, but surely this issue should be immune from political comment. The failure to offer the nation's condolences to the families of soldiers who commit suicide is and always was a terrible policy, especially since those families have an additional burden to bear and may need those condolences even more than the families of those who die in combat. Let's just change the policy and recognize that the grief of families whose loved ones die while serving the country deserve recognition and condolence regardless of the immediate cause of death.”
EmmaJ76 replied on Nov 25, 2009 at 08:04:26
“Well said 1dogs.”
Land Mine Treaty Won't Be Signed By Obama Administration
Commented Nov 25, 2009 at 07:08:13 in Politics
“What's sad is the knee-jerk reaction of some liberals based on partial information, misinformation and/or disinformation, reactions as automatic and unthinking as the reactions of conservatives to whatever they read or hear, regardless of how fact-free or incomplete that information is. The cluck-clucking about this issue based on this very misleading article is a prime example of the lack of critical analysis and research skills of many HP commenters. Neo-cons are not the only ones who don't do nuance.”
Land Mine Treaty Won't Be Signed By Obama Administration
Commented Nov 25, 2009 at 06:53:19 in Politics
“The headline may be accurate, but the article seriously misrepresents the facts and the policy of the Obama and previous administrations on the subject. See, e.g.,
http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2006/September/20060922153943adynned0.8831903.html
http://www.nae.edu/Publications/TheBridge/Archives/V31-2ScienceTechnologyMilitaryExperimentation/TheQuesttoReplace”
http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2006/September/20060922153943adynned0.8831903.html
http://www.nae.edu/Publications/TheBridge/Archives/V31-2ScienceTechnologyMilitaryExperimentation/TheQuesttoReplace”
thrdr replied on Nov 25, 2009 at 08:02:49
“The article misrepresents nothing.
The distinction between "persistent" and "non-persistent" landmines, made in the U.S. government press-release you point to with your first link (the second link appears to be broken), is in reality artificial, as anyone who knows about the largely dysfunctional "non-persistent" U.S.-manufactured landmines that were shipped to Israel for use in Lebanon in 2006, and which are still being dug up, can attest. The problem with these devices is that, always to some degree and sometimes to a huge degree--and particularly when they are dropped typically as "cluster bombs" in huge quantities--they cannot be made "non-persistent;" therefore they should be banned.
Even if the dubious claim made by the press-release's headline ("U.S. Land Mine Policy Surpasses Ottawa Treaty . . .") could be taken straight, which it can't, what would be the harm of signing this treaty, which would put the U.S. under further international and U.S. Constitutional obligation? The status quo policy simply allows the U.S. to claim that it's rules are "better" AND arbitrarily rescind their application, in particular with regard to its use of anti-personel mines.”
The distinction between "persistent" and "non-persistent" landmines, made in the U.S. government press-release you point to with your first link (the second link appears to be broken), is in reality artificial, as anyone who knows about the largely dysfunctional "non-persistent" U.S.-manufactured landmines that were shipped to Israel for use in Lebanon in 2006, and which are still being dug up, can attest. The problem with these devices is that, always to some degree and sometimes to a huge degree--and particularly when they are dropped typically as "cluster bombs" in huge quantities--they cannot be made "non-persistent;" therefore they should be banned.
Even if the dubious claim made by the press-release's headline ("U.S. Land Mine Policy Surpasses Ottawa Treaty . . .") could be taken straight, which it can't, what would be the harm of signing this treaty, which would put the U.S. under further international and U.S. Constitutional obligation? The status quo policy simply allows the U.S. to claim that it's rules are "better" AND arbitrarily rescind their application, in particular with regard to its use of anti-personel mines.”
State Dinner PICTURES, Details: Inside The White House Gala (PHOTOS)
Commented Nov 25, 2009 at 06:39:32 in Style
“Do you eat bread with a knife and fork?”
Kerry Daughter's DUI Charge Dropped Over Insufficient Evidence
Commented Nov 23, 2009 at 18:54:42 in Politics
“"a breathalyzer test showed her blood-alcohol level was under the legal limit."
Based on the evidence that she was NOT driving under the influence, the charges should never have been brought in the firs place.”
Based on the evidence that she was NOT driving under the influence, the charges should never have been brought in the firs place.”
unitron replied on Nov 24, 2009 at 04:46:24
“In at least one state they have to arrest you for DUI before they can breathalyze you.”
Rep. Patrick Kennedy Banned From Receiving Communion By Bishop Thomas Tobin
Commented Nov 23, 2009 at 09:10:15 in Politics
“Yes, Justice Sotomayor is Catholic.”
Rep. Patrick Kennedy Banned From Receiving Communion By Bishop Thomas Tobin
Commented Nov 23, 2009 at 07:48:44 in Politics
“If the Catholic Church keeps this up, it will re-create the fears and suspicion of undue Vatican influence that prevented the election of a Catholic President until JFK put those fears to rest. The effect of the Church's over-reaching will create a backlash against Catholic candidates for any elected position. Indeed, the presence of 6 Catholics among the 9 Supreme Court Justices has already created a well-founded fear of undue Vatican influence on the interpretation of the Constitution.
In effect, the Church is now saying that a "good" Catholic cannot serve in elected office without espousing the positions of the Church, even when they are contrary to the established laws of this land. We don't get a vote in the election of the Pope. The Pope and his minions don't get to intervene in our elections or our legislative process.”
In effect, the Church is now saying that a "good" Catholic cannot serve in elected office without espousing the positions of the Church, even when they are contrary to the established laws of this land. We don't get a vote in the election of the Pope. The Pope and his minions don't get to intervene in our elections or our legislative process.”
loria replied on Nov 23, 2009 at 08:26:44
“Is Sotomayor Catholic? If she is will the Church start pressuring her by refusing to give her communion if her Supreme Ct. decisions don't coincide with the doctrines of the Catholic Church?
If the Church wants to see their members elected to public officer perhaps they should think twice about the public influence they are trying to place on them. Personally, trying to blackmail a public official (which is essentially what they are doing) should result in the loss of their tax exempt status.
I know it is difficult to leave the Catholic Church when you are raised in it. It is just part of who you are. It took years for me to realize that I wasn't Catholic because I didn't believe in so many of their teachings (I've question the infallibility of the Pope since I first heard about it. Tell me, Catholics, where that is in the bible). As difficult as it might be for them, I would love to see the Kennedys unite together and leave the Church because of this. The Kennedys have done tremendous good over the decades (they aren't perfect, but who is). I guess the Church will just look the other way when and discount all the good done by them.”
If the Church wants to see their members elected to public officer perhaps they should think twice about the public influence they are trying to place on them. Personally, trying to blackmail a public official (which is essentially what they are doing) should result in the loss of their tax exempt status.
I know it is difficult to leave the Catholic Church when you are raised in it. It is just part of who you are. It took years for me to realize that I wasn't Catholic because I didn't believe in so many of their teachings (I've question the infallibility of the Pope since I first heard about it. Tell me, Catholics, where that is in the bible). As difficult as it might be for them, I would love to see the Kennedys unite together and leave the Church because of this. The Kennedys have done tremendous good over the decades (they aren't perfect, but who is). I guess the Church will just look the other way when and discount all the good done by them.”
Rep. Patrick Kennedy Banned From Receiving Communion By Bishop Thomas Tobin
Commented Nov 23, 2009 at 07:32:58 in Politics
“Too many people are more dedicated to the particular tenets of their religion and an effort to force their belief on those who do not share them than they are to the laws of their country.”
catlady777 replied on Nov 23, 2009 at 08:18:55
“Too many religious folks are obsessed with controlling people vs. living their faith. They should show the love of Christ by living instead of this vindictive, judgmental attitude we see today. The bible says this about church leaders in Luke Chapter 11 - You Pharisees clean the outside of cups and dishes, but on the inside you are greedy and evil. You fools! Didn't God make both the outside and the inside? If you would only give what you have to the poor, everything you do would please God. You should be fair and kind to others. You love the front seats in the meeting places, and you like to be greeted with honor in the market. You are like unmarked graves that people walk on without even knowing it. A teacher of the Law of Moses spoke up, "Teacher, you said cruel things about us." Jesus replied: You teachers are also in for trouble! You load people down with heavy burdens, but you won't lift a finger to help them carry the loads. You build monuments to honor the prophets your own people murdered long ago. You must think that was the right thing for your people to do, or else you would not have built monuments for the prophets they murdered. You carry the keys to the door of knowledge about God. But you never go in, and you keep others from going in.”
Rep. Patrick Kennedy Banned From Receiving Communion By Bishop Thomas Tobin
Commented Nov 23, 2009 at 07:30:32 in Politics
“The separation of church and state is violated when a church hierarchy pressures an elected official to change his support for a tenet of American constitutional law to a position favored by the hierarchy that is contrary to American constitutional law. Doh.”
Lionsden replied on Nov 23, 2009 at 12:25:11
“Bethin:
Are you saying that religious groups have fewer political rights than other groups?”
Are you saying that religious groups have fewer political rights than other groups?”
Old Folks To Senate: Vote For Cloture Already
Commented Nov 21, 2009 at 18:36:40 in Politics
“Excuse me, but starting a generational war will help no one. As an old person myself, I'm far more concerned that young people get a good start in life with the kind of medical care that I had when I was young (because it was affordable) so that they too have a chance to live a healthy, productive life.”
SouthernYankeeBelle replied on Nov 21, 2009 at 19:00:23
“idogs2, I am with ya. I am only 61 shortly to be 62 and will be getting early social security. I am lucky that my husband retired from the military after 21 yrs so we have Tricare for retired military. We both have had some really problems and have been lucky that our insurance has covered the majority except for our co-pay. When and if am lucky to reach 65 and get medicare and keep my Tricare I will be happy. I am very worried about the young people in the country. I am willing to pay alittle more to help the younger generation. After all like you said insurance was a whole lot cheaper in the early 60s. I don't know what happened. This shouldn't be this way. My son who is a cook for 10 yrs pays over $400 a month for himself and his daughter. He can't afford anything else. The insurance he does have is down right terrible. I was hoping that they would of made a Medicare for all and be done with it.”
Antifascist-08 replied on Nov 21, 2009 at 18:59:20
“That's fine. Unfortunately, the insurance companies have decided that their bottom lines are more important than providing care.
The last ten years have seen Insurance company profits go way up while care has been restricted and policies rescinded and changed when care is needed. Its all about money now.
This wasn't the way when we were younger. It is going to take a big shift in priorities to change this business climate, which pervades every for-profit business except many small businesses.
The only hope fr younger people is to eventually get a single payer system, Medicare for all, that everyone pays into. That would not exclude private companies from providing their own services if they can provide them at a reasonable cost or to those who have a lot of money.”
The last ten years have seen Insurance company profits go way up while care has been restricted and policies rescinded and changed when care is needed. Its all about money now.
This wasn't the way when we were younger. It is going to take a big shift in priorities to change this business climate, which pervades every for-profit business except many small businesses.
The only hope fr younger people is to eventually get a single payer system, Medicare for all, that everyone pays into. That would not exclude private companies from providing their own services if they can provide them at a reasonable cost or to those who have a lot of money.”
josaboeesq replied on Nov 21, 2009 at 18:48:04
“You may have misunderstood my comments. The old people now retiring have paid into Medicare their entire working lives. Now Medicare has run out of money. We simply need to double down with the young people and increase the benefits for old people so that the now old people can get what they are entitled to. When the kids get old, we can double down again. we will be able to show that Bernie Madoff was a piker.”
Senate Puts Off Action On 'Don't Ask Don't Tell'
Commented Nov 21, 2009 at 07:47:28 in Politics
“No, actually it wouldn't be a different story. It took women another 50 years to get the vote after the 15th Amendment was adopted and the ERA has yet to be adopted. That hasn't prevented women from fighting for the civil rights of others as well as their own, or from recognizing that issues of war and peace, economic justice and various other issues take precedence. Consider the unwillingness of women legislators to torpedo HCR in spite of the poison pill amendment that would seriously erode their right to choose. Good citizens see themselves as Americans first and members of minority groups second.”
AguynamedWayne replied on Nov 21, 2009 at 07:56:08
“And if you'll check with the history books, you will see that gay people were marching with MLK in places like Selma for other people's civil rights, Bayard Rustin -a gay man- was the main person responsible for MLK's march on Washington where he gave the "I Have A Dream" speech. But years laters our civil equality is still being denied.”
AguynamedWayne replied on Nov 21, 2009 at 07:51:26
“But I don't see anyother community TODAY being told that they should give up ANY of thier rights, but the gay community is supposed to just accept 2nd class citizenship and be happy at the back of the bus.
YOU CAN FORGET THAT. Gay people have been waiting on equality since the FALL OF ROME. We have waited enough.
Have fun without our support in the next election. Obama's numbers are already tanking below 50%. Don't expect our help. Since no one wants to live up to their promises. The gayTM is CLOSED.”
YOU CAN FORGET THAT. Gay people have been waiting on equality since the FALL OF ROME. We have waited enough.
Have fun without our support in the next election. Obama's numbers are already tanking below 50%. Don't expect our help. Since no one wants to live up to their promises. The gayTM is CLOSED.”
Obama Faces Showdowns On Health Care, Afghanistan, Jobs
Commented Nov 20, 2009 at 06:44:42 in Politics
“Didn't you forget the cost of two wars during the Bush administration that Bush forgot to pay for?”
bzb replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 06:48:21
“Along with the $30 billion dollar loan from China and the $600 billion dollar Medicare reform that was not paid for and the $700 billion dollar bailout money he gave away.”
Rachel Maddow, Frank Schaeffer Discuss The Latest In Thinly-Veiled Evangelical Christian Obama Death Threats
Commented Nov 19, 2009 at 06:29:28 in Politics
“I hope the FBI and the Secret Service are listening to Frank Schaeffer. He knows whereof he speaks.
Schaeffer points out that Americans keep asking why moderate Muslims do not denounce the jihadists (which in fact many do whose comments are not widely reported by the MSM), but the same Americans are not asking why evangelicals are not denouncing the crazy fringers among them who openly call for the President's death. The line between "deluded" and "crazy" is and will remain invisible until there is an outcry against this sort or rant.”
Schaeffer points out that Americans keep asking why moderate Muslims do not denounce the jihadists (which in fact many do whose comments are not widely reported by the MSM), but the same Americans are not asking why evangelicals are not denouncing the crazy fringers among them who openly call for the President's death. The line between "deluded" and "crazy" is and will remain invisible until there is an outcry against this sort or rant.”
Sarah Palin: I'd Like To Be Chief Of Staff
Commented Nov 19, 2009 at 06:09:02 in Politics
“I'd like to be the tooth fairy and I'm likelier to achieve my ambition than Palin is to achieve hers.”
Grassley To Holder: Remember O.J. Simpson Before Trying KSM
Commented Nov 19, 2009 at 06:06:36 in Politics
“Among the many things that non-lawyer Sen. Grassley doesn't know or understand about the American justice system is the difference between state and federal courts. Trials in federal district courts do not turn into the circuses and zoos that trials in state courts occasionally do. Experienced federal prosecutors do not make the kinds of errors that the O.J. prosecutors did and federal judges seldom lose control of their courtrooms.
A.G. Holder's testimony yesterday, particularly in response to Sen. Kyl, was brilliant. The GOP campaign to use these trials to create fear and division in the electorate is a purely cynical effort to further erode the confidence of the country in our own institutions or a display of GOPer genuine cowardice, or both. Holder's decision and explanation thereof, on the other hand, are a model of courage, the application of the rule of law and a long overdue affirmation of our principles of justice.”
A.G. Holder's testimony yesterday, particularly in response to Sen. Kyl, was brilliant. The GOP campaign to use these trials to create fear and division in the electorate is a purely cynical effort to further erode the confidence of the country in our own institutions or a display of GOPer genuine cowardice, or both. Holder's decision and explanation thereof, on the other hand, are a model of courage, the application of the rule of law and a long overdue affirmation of our principles of justice.”
Gidster replied on Nov 19, 2009 at 12:19:58
“But that is what the Republican agenda has been since 1989!
Erode confidence in Government, cast aspersions at Democrats, feed that distrust, then claim to be trust worthy......
What they fail to grasp is that the internet has exposed them for what they are, and we no longer fall for the BS!”
Erode confidence in Government, cast aspersions at Democrats, feed that distrust, then claim to be trust worthy......
What they fail to grasp is that the internet has exposed them for what they are, and we no longer fall for the BS!”
Harkin: Dems Will Force Senate Republicans To Stay '24 Hours A Day'
Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 13:57:50 in Politics
“Way to go, Senator Harkin!!!”
David Brooks: Palin's A 'Joke,' A 'Potential Talk Show Host' (VIDEO)
Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 15:03:26 in Politics
“Amen to that.”
Frank Rich: The Missing Link Between Fort Hood And The War In Afghanistan
Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 07:14:25 in Politics
“We're experiencing the present "rough ride" as a consequence of decisions made by the most ignorant president America has ever had the misfortune to have, a man who sought counsel from "a higher father" than his own and who, two weeks before our invasion of Iraq, had never heard of Sunnis and Shias and was wholly ignorant of the religious, tribal and political differences among the Iraqis. The same man implemented the policies of permitting OBL to escape in Afghanistan and instead of bringing that war to a close after the Taliban fled, continued an ineffectual occupation that resulted in a resurgence of the Taliban and the present costly stalemate for which there is no good solution, but only a series of bad options.
The leadership of a President who is well informed and sufficiently flexible to change a policy based on changing conditions and more complete information is such a vast improvement on the model of the previous administration that anyone with any brains is applauding this President and hoping for a more rational policy than has previously existed.”
The leadership of a President who is well informed and sufficiently flexible to change a policy based on changing conditions and more complete information is such a vast improvement on the model of the previous administration that anyone with any brains is applauding this President and hoping for a more rational policy than has previously existed.”
HamletsMill replied on Nov 15, 2009 at 17:25:48
“Your analysis of GWB is spot on. I hope you are right on President Obama. But I am fearing no human being on Earth can stand up to the Military Industrial Congressional Beltway Think Tank Banker Complex of the United States. They own us. So far it is endless war for war profits for the oligarchy while the little people do the dying. 40 years after Vietnam absolutely nothing whatsoever has changed. Make the money. Build a war memorial for the destroyed. Move on. That is still the play.”
Frank Rich: The Missing Link Between Fort Hood And The War In Afghanistan
Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 06:58:26 in Politics
“The withdrawal schedule was negotiated by Bush in the waning days of his administration to pre-empt the new administration from implementing a more rapid pull-out -- a fact ignored equally by both the left and the right when the issue of Iraq arises.”
SurrealPumpkin replied on Nov 15, 2009 at 07:35:09
“That's because both the left and right are trying to ignore Bush as hard as they can.
In any event, there is an end in sight for Iraq, the SoFA agreement was signed by Bush and Obama has stated his intention to comply with it.”
In any event, there is an end in sight for Iraq, the SoFA agreement was signed by Bush and Obama has stated his intention to comply with it.”
Thomson Prison In Illinois Is Leading Choice In Obama's Search For Stateside Gitmo
Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 06:28:12 in Chicago
“Are the GOPers who oppose imprisoning convicted terrorists in federal prisons really as cowardly and irrational as they sound, or is their rhetoric merely the stale GOP political tactic of fomenting fear in the electorate for political gain? Or is it simply another GOP tactic to prevent President Obama from cleaning up the unholy mess that the Bush administration's stupidities created, in this instance, to prevent the closing of Guantanamo?
As a resident of Illinois, I have no objection to incarcerating convicted terrorists in my state. In fact, I hope they are sent here, particularly in light of the jobs that would be created in an area hard hit by the Great Recession. The idea of a terrorist plot to attack a prison amid the cornfields of rural Illinois is hilarious.”
As a resident of Illinois, I have no objection to incarcerating convicted terrorists in my state. In fact, I hope they are sent here, particularly in light of the jobs that would be created in an area hard hit by the Great Recession. The idea of a terrorist plot to attack a prison amid the cornfields of rural Illinois is hilarious.”
Obama Bows In Japan To Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko (VIDEO, PHOTOS)
Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 05:44:10 in Style
“What a pity that some Americans haven't the sense to enjoy their good fortune in having a President who is not a boor, doesn't embarrass us every time he goes abroad and takes the time to learn the customs of the countries he visits. He doesn't stuff his face and chew with his mouth open while talking to the British Prime Minister, spewing food and such stupidities as, "The trouble with the French is they have no word for 'entrepreneur'." He doesn't put his hands on the German Chancellor and obsess about a pig roast when asked serious policy questions at a press conference. At a private dinner with the Japanese Emperor, he doesn't vomit in his lap. Etc.
Observing the customs of a country one visits is a sign of respect for and knowledge of that country's culture. That appears to be exactly what those Americans who criticize the President's behavior object to. Such conduct lacks the arrogant assumptions that underlie the ideology of "American exceptionalism" that is so dear to their hearts but which has earned the anger and contempt of rest of the world.”
Observing the customs of a country one visits is a sign of respect for and knowledge of that country's culture. That appears to be exactly what those Americans who criticize the President's behavior object to. Such conduct lacks the arrogant assumptions that underlie the ideology of "American exceptionalism" that is so dear to their hearts but which has earned the anger and contempt of rest of the world.”
Daniel Pearl's Family Disagrees WIth NYC Trial For Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 05:03:32 in World
“When they are tried in our criminal courts for crimes committed in our country, they are tried by our rules, of which we are justly proud. Use your head. Should American criminals who commit crimes in foreign countries and are tried there be tried by American rules?”
Daniel Pearl's Family Disagrees WIth NYC Trial For Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
Commented Nov 15, 2009 at 05:00:14 in World
“Exactly.”
NYC Terror Trial Poses Legal, Political Risks
Commented Nov 14, 2009 at 15:27:08 in New York
“And . . . ? Nothing in that opinion contradicts what I said. In your case, a defendant was tried with tainted evidence. The state was then given the option of re-trying him without tainted evidence or releasing him. Competent prosecutors do not introduce tainted evidence, and competent defense counsel test such evidence by motion before the trial. The only evidence in question is that obtained from the defendant's mouth without Miranda warnings or through coercion and any evidence acquired as a result of such improper questioning (the fruit of the poisoned tree). Evidence acquired without the defendant's help, on the other hand, is not tainted.
If you imagine that the prosecutor is going to introduce tainted evidence against these defendants, you don't know much about A.G. Holder and good federal prosecutors.”
If you imagine that the prosecutor is going to introduce tainted evidence against these defendants, you don't know much about A.G. Holder and good federal prosecutors.”


