HuffPost Social News

BillN's Comments (45)

View Comments:   Sort:
next
1 - 25 of 45
Will The Unemployment Disaster Be Obama's Katrina?

Will The Unemployment Disaster Be Obama's Katrina?

Commented Nov 24, 2009 at 09:24:14 in Politics

“It's amazing that we even got this far, considering the throngs of so-called patriots out there cheer-leading for failure.

Like Katrina, this economic disaster was created by republicans. Let's not forget that.”

From the Raft replied on Nov 24, 2009 at 09:47:22

“Right and the Dinos want to see it continue.”

BarakCarpathia replied on Nov 24, 2009 at 09:40:20

“Katrina was created by republicans?”
AP Asks If Obama Is

AP Asks If Obama Is "Obnoxiously Articulate"

Commented Oct 15, 2009 at 22:53:30 in Media

“AP is just another soft right wing media tool disguised as mainstream. Still can't understand why the America Left channels on Sirius and XM use AP as their primary news source. Seems a bit out of place to me.”

RTIII replied on Oct 16, 2009 at 00:19:42

“Money. Or, more specifically, price.
.”
AP Asks If Obama Is

AP Asks If Obama Is "Obnoxiously Articulate"

Commented Oct 15, 2009 at 22:51:23 in Media

“Can't say I remember that, but I do remember his being referred to constantly by the media as "The Great Communicat­or."”

weatherwaxx replied on Oct 16, 2009 at 01:16:55

“"Great Prevaricator," is more like it. His deregulation set us up for the Second Great Republican Depression.”

ComeOnAlready replied on Oct 15, 2009 at 23:33:53

“exactly!!”
huffingtonpost entry

Gay Rights Speech: What Should Obama Say Tonight?

Commented Oct 10, 2009 at 17:40:58 in Politics

“I think it sometimes helps if you consider the source.

So-called Christians who take it upon themselves to judge others - even though their Bible tells them not to - have a basic personality disorder that causes them to think in this self-righteous way.

As an example of a more extreme case, one of those fundamentalist republicans was a guy named Dennis Rader - deacon of his Lutheran church in Topeka, KS and leader of the youth program there for years - a real stand-up Christian conservati­ve... right up until they found out he was the infamous BTK killer.

Here is a guy who took it upon himself to judge others, and thus felt justified in binding, torturing and killing people because of his personal beliefs. He felt that his Lord had made a special exception in his case.

There are hundreds of other examples of people who take their basic Christian beliefs and twist them to the point of fanaticism. Of course, these people are always given media attention before anyone else with a more reasonable point of view.”
huffingtonpost entry

Gay Rights Speech: What Should Obama Say Tonight?

Commented Oct 10, 2009 at 17:22:07 in Politics

“Hail to the motherland­... and Tim Horton's.”
huffingtonpost entry

New Rule Suggestion for Bill Maher: Afghan War Supporters Must Walk the Walk to Be Heard

Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 00:02:07 in Politics

“No.”
huffingtonpost entry

New Rule Suggestion for Bill Maher: Afghan War Supporters Must Walk the Walk to Be Heard

Commented Oct 07, 2009 at 23:59:38 in Politics

“Thank you, but no. The commander-in-chief of the US armed forces is a civilian by design - just as the founders and the authors of our Constitution intended.

This thread pertains to so-called "journalists" and other right-wing pundits who are cheerleaders for war, but who lack the basic courage to do it themselves. You see, it takes no special talent or intestinal fortitude to promote war - as long as someone else (or someone else's kids) have to fight it.

The term "chicken hawk" is a very accurate and appropriate depiction of such people.”
<em>This Week In Magazines</em>: Obama The

This Week In Magazines: Obama The "Self-Entangling Giant"

Commented Sep 28, 2009 at 08:22:01 in Media

“I don't recall Mr. Wills mentioning anything about "presidential overreach" during the last eight-year administration (especially when it was running rampant), yet with this president in office barely eight months, he's all over it.

How convenient for the conservative Mr. Wills to compare this current president with the one that was (mostly) reviled by the American populace. The implication that they are equals in their political nature and in their world view is pure nonsense.”

Mystic01 replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 08:40:11

“Are you confusing Garry Wills with George F. Will? Will is conservative; Wills is not. It's a common mistake to confuse these two because their names are so similar; but their ideas are not similar.”

Matrsnot replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 08:34:26

“Can't stand the facts or truth Huh? Disclaim one fact in the article and back it up with sources.”

pfc1369 replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 08:34:08

“Your response is exactly what Wills and his cowardly ilk deserve, and more.”

postman66 replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 08:33:31

“Oh contriare, Willis was a strident critic of Bush. Read his book " Bush's Fringe Government".”

Lurker50 replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 08:33:13

“That's what I don't get. How do you compare 8 months to 8 years?”

ThunderclapNewman replied on Sep 28, 2009 at 08:32:34

“As is true of most conservatives, Wills' outrage is very selective.”
Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!

Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!

Commented Sep 21, 2009 at 19:59:01 in Business

“Amen. Not to mention government (or at least some of it) run amok with big business in their pocket.”
Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!

Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!

Commented Sep 21, 2009 at 19:53:31 in Business

“Yes, he is. And he is also a philanthropist.

Bernie Madoff was also a capitalist­... and a criminal.

Your point?”
Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!

Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore's New Movie (and So Must You)!

Commented Sep 21, 2009 at 19:50:38 in Business

“Your comment presupposes that the intent of this movie is to bring an end to capitalism.

Well, it isn't.

The intent of the movie is to wake people up to the fact that capitalism (like religion) has been corrupted to the point where corporations and rich people are now allowed to break the law, change the rules, and hoard our country's resources (OUR resources) so that they can have it all - leaving the rest of us with little or nothing. In short, the war against the greed-mongers has begun.

There is nothing wrong with capitalism - as long as it's done right - and everyone has an equal and fair chance to enjoy its rewards.

To the creeps that this movie takes aim at, I ask the question, "How much is enough?"”
Five More Forged Letters Uncovered From Bonner & Associates' Work for DC Coal Lobby - Read Them Here

Five More Forged Letters Uncovered From Bonner & Associates' Work for DC Coal Lobby - Read Them Here

Commented Aug 18, 2009 at 20:58:41 in Green

“When the conversation and debate descends into lies, innuendo and misrepresentation on the part of the right-wing corporatocracy, it is a clear indicator that they no longer have an ethical leg to stand on.

Let's recognize it for what it is, and finish it while we have the momentum.”

One more Thing replied on Aug 18, 2009 at 23:39:41

“You are so right!”

joebaggadonuts replied on Aug 18, 2009 at 21:45:18

“Amen.”
Right Wingers Wreak Havoc on Philadelphia Town Meeting

Right Wingers Wreak Havoc on Philadelphia Town Meeting

Commented Aug 04, 2009 at 00:00:12 in Eyes & Ears

“I agree - as much as it goes against my grain. Yes, people have a right to free speech - but people also have a right to hear diverse opinions and other information from their elected representatives without being shouted down or disrupted.

They should just make a rule that you enter, you sit down, and you be quiet until it's your turn to ask a question. If you want to be disruptive, then you are removed from the room - that simple.

They brought this on themselves. Hopefully their corporate lobbyist benefactors have set a few dollars aside for the bail bondsman.”
Right Wingers Wreak Havoc on Philadelphia Town Meeting

Right Wingers Wreak Havoc on Philadelphia Town Meeting

Commented Aug 03, 2009 at 23:55:21 in Eyes & Ears

“Your nose is growing again, Pinocchio.­..”
Right Wingers Wreak Havoc on Philadelphia Town Meeting

Right Wingers Wreak Havoc on Philadelphia Town Meeting

Commented Aug 03, 2009 at 23:49:46 in Eyes & Ears

“Chavez made the mistake of doing the very "evil" thing of kicking large oil corporations out of his country who were stealing natural resources out from under Venezuela while greasing the palms of crooked politicians. Now, oil revenues pay for the country's national health care system (to name one of the many benefits), and people in their 80's are seeing a doctor for the first time in their lives.

He may not be perfect, but he takes care of his working class, senior citizens, and other disadvantaged people in his country... which is more than I can say about a Republican in this country.”
Right Wingers Wreak Havoc on Philadelphia Town Meeting

Right Wingers Wreak Havoc on Philadelphia Town Meeting

Commented Aug 03, 2009 at 23:44:31 in Eyes & Ears

“Sorry, but the speech wasn't "free" - it had to be bought and paid for by corporate lobbyists representing the health care industry. They are spending 1.4 million dollars a day toward this end to try to silence the health care movement. It's not going to work.”
Right Wingers Wreak Havoc on Philadelphia Town Meeting

Right Wingers Wreak Havoc on Philadelphia Town Meeting

Commented Aug 03, 2009 at 23:39:40 in Eyes & Ears

“It's called hooliganism, bought and paid for by corporate lobbyists. Back in the 1930s, they had a special way of dealing with paid hooligans. It involved a big stick and an organized group of people of the opposite view.

These wack-o's should give serious consideration to taking their teabags, and going home... before things really get out of control.

Health care is a serious issue, and no progressive in any venue is going to be shouted down by a group of corporate-sponsored fools who can't think for themselves, and have to be paid to exercise their "first amendment rights."”
Why the Birthers?

Why the Birthers?

Commented Jul 25, 2009 at 01:08:36 in Politics

“John McCain was born into a military family who was stationed overseas. Upon his birth in Panama, his family received a "Certificate of Live Birth of an American Citizen Abroad", issued by the American Consulate (the U.S. State Department) in Panama.

Any state accepts that document as proof of citizenship, and will certify the birth at the state level - thus making a "Certificate of Live Birth" available for Mr. McCain and his family in the state in which he lived.

If that fact raised enough concern for a Senate hearing, it's because Mr. McCain was physically born in a foreign country.

Mr. Obama was not.”
Why the Birthers?

Why the Birthers?

Commented Jul 25, 2009 at 00:59:08 in Politics

“Sorry - but that's just a blatant lie.

I lived in Ewa Beach, Hawaii and my certificate of live birth was perfectly adequate and legal for obtaining a Hawaii state driver's license.

Birthers aren't about the truth. Neither are you, apparently.”
Why the Birthers?

Why the Birthers?

Commented Jul 25, 2009 at 00:51:25 in Politics

“Amazingly enough, I can go to the hospital where I was born in 1953, and obtain a copy of my "Birth Certificate" complete with my little footprints, and my mother's thumb print. It is, however, not the legal document that is required in order to obtain a drivers license, enlist in the armed forces, obtain a Social Security card or a passport, or become President.

In order to obtain the LEGAL document, I have to go to the State's Dept. of Vital Statistics to obtain a "Certificate of Live Birth".

You know very well - as do most of us - that you have NEVER personally been required to produce your hospital "Birth Certificate" for anything, nor does anyone need to know what time of the day you were born or any information that granular.

The fact that you were born here, on a given date, at a given place - with a signature of an authorized public health official - is perfectly legal - and it applies to EVERYONE in all 50 states. Not just to Barack Obama.

What you allege about Obama's educational records not being publicly available - is propaganda spread around by the same birther clowns who have to invent their own controversy - because the truth doesn't work for them.

A guy who attended, and taught at Harvard - and was president of the Harvard Law Review doesn't need to hide his grades or his degrees from anyone.

Nice try.”

cobobs replied on Jul 25, 2009 at 06:40:34

“The hospital "birth certificate" is a vanity document. The Certificate of Live Birth is based on mandatory information collected by the state from hospitals and such. It is the real record. It also states the place of birth. Are they saying Obama changed the law in Hawaii and manipulated his records because some day he would be running for president? This is so crazy. That is why some of them pretend by saying, let him just release the documents. What documents? He is doing well. Ignore the crazies.”

digitalprophet replied on Jul 25, 2009 at 03:28:47

“*applauds.­. Keep fighting the good fight..

It's almost like Natural Selection is kicking in showing us who really is a bit lacking the brain department =P”

Citizen4honor replied on Jul 25, 2009 at 01:41:50

“Well that's interesting information and made me think - hey we just all got our passports and had to get new birth certificates from 3 different states. Michigan and Ohio say Certificate of Live Birth and contain all the information - hospital, time, date, doctor etc. But Pennsylvannia's says Certifcation of Birth and looks like what Obama posted. OK I stand corrected on the Birth Certificate thing. I do however think we should have seen his diploma's and other info. Again why hide that info?

I know someone who never graduated from college - sent out a resume with great grade point averages and they work for a major company at a senior level - and no one has caught on yet.”
Has There Really Been a Policy Change in Iraq?

Has There Really Been a Policy Change in Iraq?

Commented Jun 30, 2009 at 11:11:59 in Politics

“Obama's campaign promises were to end our involvement in the Iraq war. Just because it doesn't happen in a week, doesn't mean it's not happening. The draw-down is gradual.

As of July 1, our troops are out of the major cities.

Oil companies are bidding on the commercial rights to Iraq's oil fields

The republicans already told us, "The surge was a success." I have to believe them, because they're always right about everything (not).

If the people of Iraq want to continue to kill each other as a solution to their social and religious differences, that is for them to determine and pay the consequences for. It is not for the US to decide, or intervene in at the sacrifice of our own young people.

As far as I'm concerned, President Obama is keeping his campaign promise - just not as quickly as some of us would like.”
After GM and Chrysler Bankruptcies -- What Now?

After GM and Chrysler Bankruptcies -- What Now?

Commented Jun 02, 2009 at 00:11:00 in Home

“So what's your solution - put Bill Clinton or a Republican back in the White House? You don't have enough fingers and toes to count the number of (additional) plant closures you would see in that scenario, thanks to more NAFTA or GATT.

Obama didn't create this mess - he inherited it. If you expect him to fix everything to your liking during his first six months in office, then you need to return to your home planet, my friend. On this planet, that doesn't come close to reality.

Give it a chance. He's smarter than his previous two predecessors put together.”

twogunmojo replied on Jun 02, 2009 at 06:39:44

“any chance of us seeing his college records to prove how smart he is....but i will say that guns in parks law was brilliant.­...hahahhh­hahahahah.­..”
After GM and Chrysler Bankruptcies -- What Now?

After GM and Chrysler Bankruptcies -- What Now?

Commented Jun 01, 2009 at 23:58:07 in Home

“For the record, the "Big 3" didn't die. It's GM and Chrysler who were the only companies bailed out by the government with a LOAN, and who filed for bankruptcy protection.

Poor management yes. "Excessive government regulation" - I don't think so. Japanese competitors (as well as Ford) have had to comply with the same regulations - yet none of them (including Ford) have taken a single dollar from the US government, nor have they had to file for bankruptcy protection.

Requiring better fuel economy and alternative fuel options is not what most people would consider "excessive regulation­." It's long overdue, and necessary in order for us to compete globally and address the climate change issue. The technology is already available. All they lacked was the will, and the permission of their oil company masters.

Obama has done plenty to address the "poor management" issue (google "Rick Wagoner"), so your "clueless" argument doesn't hold water.”
After GM and Chrysler Bankruptcies -- What Now?

After GM and Chrysler Bankruptcies -- What Now?

Commented Jun 01, 2009 at 23:12:30 in Home

“No guilt tripping necessary for this consumer. I'd put a Saturn Aura up against a Hyundai Sonata or Honda Accord any day of the week. Also, in case anyone hasn't noticed, most of the Federal vehicle fleet are GM products - right down to President Obama's Cadillac limo, meaning they already have a lot of skin in this game.

Maybe someone out there can explain to me how a General Motors, Ford, or Chrysler can compete with their "global market" counterparts like Toyota, Honda, Daimler-Benz, etc. while being saddled with billions of dollars in health care costs for their active and retired employees - costs which the Toyota's, Honda's, et al DON'T have.

I'm all ears.

Level the playing field. Then we'll talk.”

GEM-592 replied on Jun 02, 2009 at 00:38:08

“btw UAW made concessions in the latest deal, I can tell u didn't know.

Maybe going all all the back to serfdom would save GM; if not at least I would satisfy some people.”

GEM-592 replied on Jun 02, 2009 at 00:20:46

“and don't worry, workers will lose either way so u can sleep easy.”

GEM-592 replied on Jun 02, 2009 at 00:10:34

“Maybe you'd put it up any day of the week, but how about over the next 15 years? Americans wouldn't, even if you would. But, fortunately you will so those worker health care costs can be financed, that makes me feel good.”

GEM-592 replied on Jun 02, 2009 at 00:00:32

“If that kind of tax payer money doesn't "level the playing field" after GM's owned the government for the last decades then I don't know what will. In any event, I don't predict there'll be anything to talk about.

I didn't say GM could compete, only I don't blame it all on the unions as you seem to : it's at best a gross oversimplification. And where I do blame them, it's not for working to secure health care and retirement benefits from GM. Instead, they shouldn't have married themselves to only the big three, and would have done better to demand union membership for ALL domestic (and even international wherever possible) auto workers, which would have helped level the playing field domestically at least. But they sold out, too bad, although I'd think you'd be pleased had you noticed this fatal self-inflicted wound of the UAW had you had your eyes open for a moment. The union and workers will be big losers either way, so you can sleep easy tonight.

But anyway, how much of your health care funding will you personally give up to make GM profitable again? I'll take your 401K and invest it in GM if you think it'll help, purely as a academic exercise.

If you really think their cars are better, that's good free advertising for them I guess. I won't ever touch one again, needless to say.”
After GM and Chrysler Bankruptcies -- What Now?

After GM and Chrysler Bankruptcies -- What Now?

Commented Jun 01, 2009 at 23:02:35 in Home

“They have no choice now but to either "get it" or color themselves gone. Pretty obvious choice if you ask me... even for an amateur.

Pres. Obama and Gov. Granholm bring something to the table that we haven't seen in a long time. It's called "fresh thinking." It's about time.”

GEM-592 replied on Jun 01, 2009 at 23:31:47

“I think GM is used to buying politicians, rather than listening to what they think. I don't think they'll be able to acclimate to any real change is their relationship, and with taxpayers committed to the teeth they'll still have a strong lobby. But, some politicians are better than others ...”
next
1 - 25 of 45