“What did they bribe the Senators with, and who specifically did the bribing? Who is the they, that kept brown out of office? The court, Roberts specifically, decided it was a tax, the WH did not argue that it was. There have been no lies about the cost, and they are actually coming in lower than expected, and there has been another 1 year delay in penalties for business to comply with the law. And again I'll ask you, what business is it of yours the medical and familial decisions a woman makes with her doctor? Are you willing to accept having someone second guess the decisions you make about YOUR health with YOUR doctor? ”
“Why won't any of you answer the question? Is it any of your business? And are you ok will this level of scrutiny being applied to your private medical and familial decisions? Can't you give a straightforward truthful answer instead of deflecting, or getting way off topic?”
“to your first point the ACA was not fast tracked. There were committee hearings for MONTHS, and floor debate as well, and why wouldn't you want healthcare? Besides if you already have healthcare, you are not required to change it. But you already know all of this. But we should not fast track legislation that takes choices and constitutional rights from half our population. Are you okay with this level of scrutiny being applied to your private medical and familial decisions?”
AlbanyConservative on Jul 2, 2013 at 07:41:59
“You are ignorant about Obamacare.
1. No one read it.
2. Reid stripped out an existing House bill in it's entirety and substituted Obamacre.
3. they bribed numerous senators to get their votes(Landrieu, Baucus and others)
4. They kept Scott Brown out of office until after the vote.
5. Deem & pass
6. The nuclear option
7. lies about the costs
8. Telling America is wasn't a tax, and then telling the court it was.
“Hahahaha, no it doesn't. It doesn't do that in any way shape or form. Thanks for staying on subject and answering my question. But you know the real answer don't you? But what I can take from your answer, of lack thereof, is that you would support the ACA, because you think it would allow the type of scrutiny that you seem okay with for other people, because remember now "whats sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." But since it doesn't open up your medical decisions to scrutiny from strangers, especially at the ballot box, you really need to think of a better answer.”
“you typed/ Look, it is not my fault nor is it my problem that you have a severe reading comprehension disorder. Jeez Louise!!
Yes it is your fault that you could not but a logical thought together. I read and re-read your comment multiple times, my best guess is that you think there are a bunch of people moving to five sparse states for an oil/gas boom and this will somehow affect something, but again there was no stated observation or conclusion from what whatever it was you cut and pasted there. ”
“It is exactly what it does. Is it really any of your business what medical and familial decisions a woman makes with her doctors? Is it any of your business at all. Think real hard about this, because if you answer yes, than you would also be saying you are okay with that same form of scrutiny involving your private medical and familial decisions. Would you be okay with me sitting in with you and your doctor, then deciding on my own that I don't like the choice you made for whatever reason I don't like it, and I don't trust you enough to think you made the right decision, so you can't do it, You would be okay with that?”
“Yes, they do not have rights, not until they have a birth certificate. Besides, is is any of your business what medical and life decisions a woman makes with her doctor? Would you be willing to have the same scrutiny applied to your private family and medical decisions?”
how did that happen on Jul 1, 2013 at 21:06:55
“In closing, I will just tell you that if we treated cattle or dogs or any other animal the same way, we would be brought up on charges and jailed.
“Wow, there you go again. Another baseless useless attack that actually sounds more like you are parroting lines from libertarians who think anyone not as enlightened to the juvenile politics they has is a zombie. Enjoy your single dimensional day!”
“You don't really know Merkley do you? He has been in politics for years here in Oregon, as a State rep, SPeaker of the house, Senator, Senate Majority leader. He's been around the block, and is a strong principled public servant. I am proud that he represents my state in the Senate.”
DrKND on Jun 13, 2013 at 17:27:06
“Actually, I do know Jeff, and I'm not sure which part of what I said about him triggered you into telling me this in a way that makes it sound like you disagree with me. In fact, I agree with everything you said except the part where you said I don't know Jeff. Maybe you don't know Jeff! But we both know that he's doing a great job representing us here in Oregon! I was referring to new in the Senate, which relatively speaking, he still is.”
“Of course, there will be myriad complaints from conservatives. If you make baseless and broad swath assumptions about people , and don't care to know better, you don't have to worry looking like an ass.”
devildog09 on Jun 13, 2013 at 16:11:48
“That sure didn't bother liberals when they invented their ugly stereotypes about the tea party.”